Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35728406›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology2022

Sweetened beverage consumption and risk of liver cancer by diabetes status: A pooled analysis.

Gieira S Jones, Barry I Graubard, Yesenia Ramirez, Linda M Liao, Wen-Yi Huang, Christian S Alvarez, Wanshui Yang, Xuehong Zhang, Jessica L Petrick, Katherine A McGlynn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Ultra-processed foods and food additives in gut health and disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gieira S JonesDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA. Electronic address: jonesgi@mail.nih.gov.
Barry I GraubardDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Yesenia RamirezDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Linda M LiaoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Wen-Yi HuangDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Christian S AlvarezDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Wanshui YangChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Nutrition, School of Public Heath, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xuehong ZhangChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jessica L PetrickSlone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine A McGlynnDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer Institute · USAnhui Medical University · CNBoston University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Studies of Rare CancersZIACP010158 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MCGLYNN, KATHERINE · 2009 to 2025
$19.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsumption of sweetened beverages has been linked to several risk factors for liver cancer including diabetes. Studies investigating the role of sweetened beverage consumption and liver cancer, however, are limited. As persons with diabetes are advised against consumption of sugar, the objective of this study was to examine the role of sweetened beverage consumption and liver cancer risk by diabetes status.

methodsData from two U.S. cohorts: the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial were harmonized and pooled. Hazard ratios and 95%CI were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models stratified by median follow-up time.

resultsAmong persons without diabetes, there were no statistical evidence of associations between liver cancer and consumption of sweetened beverages overall, sugar sweetened beverages (SSB), or artificially sweetened beverages (ASB). Sugar sweetened (SS) soda consumption, however, was associated with liver cancer in the first follow-up interval (HR:1.18. 95%CI: 1.03, 1.35). In contrast, among persons with diabetes, there were significant associations between liver cancer and consumption of sweetened beverages overall (HR: 1.12, 95%CI 1.01, 1.24), ASBs (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.25), soda overall (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.26) and artificially sweetened (AS) soda (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.27) in the first follow-up interval.

conclusionsIncreased soda consumption may be associated with risk of liver cancer. The results suggest that decreasing consumption of SS soda by persons without diabetes, and AS soda by persons with diabetes, could be associated with reduced liver cancer risk.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusLiver NeoplasmsSugar-Sweetened BeveragesBeveragesHumansMaleSugarsSweetening AgentsSugarsSweetening AgentsDiabetesLiver cancerSweetened Beverages

Identifiers

PMID35728406
PMCPMC11388171
OpenAlexW4283119820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.