Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35728285›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022

Computational repurposing approach for targeting the critical spike mutations in B.1.617.2 (delta), AY.1 (delta plus) and C.37 (lambda) SARS-CoV-2 variants using exhaustive structure-based virtual screening, molecular dynamic simulations and MM-PBSA methods.

Maryam Ebrahimi, Leila Karami, Mahdi Alijanianzadeh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A review onExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maryam EbrahimiDepartment of Plant Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Leila KaramiDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: l_karami@khu.ac.ir.
Mahdi AlijanianzadehDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: alijanian@khu.ac.ir.
Kharazmi University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of the contagious coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which was first identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Around the world, many researchers focused their research on identifying inhibitors against the druggable SARS-CoV-2 targets. The reported genomic mutations have a direct effect on the receptor-binding domain (RBD), which interacts with host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) for viral cell entry. These mutations, some of which are variants of concern (VOC), lead to increased morbidity and mortality rates. The newest variants including B.1.617.2 (Delta), AY.1 (Delta plus), and C.37 (Lambda) were considered in this study. Thus, an exhaustive structure-based virtual screening of a ligand library (in which FDA approved drugs are also present) using the drug-likeness screening, molecular docking, ADMET profiling was performed followed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and Molecular Mechanics-Poisson Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA) calculation to identify compounds or drugs can be repurposed for inhibiting the wild type, Delta, Delta plus and Lambda variants of RBD of the spike protein. Based on the virtual screening steps, two FDA approved drugs, Atovaquone (atv) and Praziquantel (prz), were selected and repurposed as the best candidates of SARS-CoV-2 RBD inhibitors. Molecular docking results display that both atv and prz contribute in different interaction with binding site residues (Gln493, Asn501 and Gly502 in the hydrogen bond formation, Phe490 and Tyr505 in the π- π stacking and Tyr449, Ser494, and Phe497 in the vdW interactions) in the wild type, Delta, Delta plus and Lambda variants of RBD of the spike protein. MD simulations revealed that among the eight studied complexes, the wild type-atv and Delta-prz complexes have the most structural stability over the simulation time. Furthermore, MM-PBSA calculation showed that in the atv containing complexes, highest binding affinity is related to the wild type-atv complex and in the prz containing complexes, it is related to the Delta-prz complex. The validation of docking results was done by comparing with experimental data (heparin in complex with wild type and Delta variants). Also, comparison of the obtained results with the result of simulation of the k22 with the studied proteins showed that atv and prz are suitable inhibitors for these proteins, especially wild type t and Delta variant, respectively. Thus, we found that atv and prz are the best candidate for inhibition of wild type and Delta variant of the spike protein. Also, atv can be an appropriate inhibitor for the Lambda variant. Obtained in silico results may help the development of new anti-COVID-19 drugs.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2Drug RepositioningHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationPeptidyl-Dipeptidase ASpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusPeptidyl-Dipeptidase ASpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Drug repurposingMolecular dynamics simulationSARS-CoV-2Spike proteinVariantsVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID35728285
PMCPMC9170597
OpenAlexW4282014132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.