ArticleFunctional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference)2021
Optimisation of Left Atrial Feature Tracking Using Retrospective Gated Computed Tomography Images.
Article in Functional imaging and modeling of the heart : ... International Workshop, FIMH ..., proceedings. FIMH (Conference), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regional heterogeneity in left atrial stiffness impacts passive deformation in a cohort of patient-specific models.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- A three-dimensional left atrial motion estimation from retrospective gated computed tomography: application in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Applications of multimodality imaging for left atrial catheter ablation.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retrospective gated cardiac computed tomography (CCT) images can provide high contrast and resolution images of the heart throughout the cardiac cycle. Feature tracking in retrospective CCT images using the temporal sparse free-form deformations (TSFFDs) registration method has previously been optimised for the left ventricle (LV). However, there is limited work on optimising nonrigid registration methods for feature tracking in the left atria (LA). This paper systematically optimises the sparsity weight (SW) and bending energy (BE) as two hyperparameters of the TSFFD method to track the LA endocardium from end-diastole (ED) to end-systole (ES) using 10-frame retrospective gated CCT images. The effect of two different control point (CP) grid resolutions was also investigated. TSFFD optimisation was achieved using the average surface distance (ASD), directed Hausdorff distance (DHD) and Dice score between the registered and ground truth surface meshes and segmentations at ES. For baseline comparison, the configuration optimised for LV feature tracking gave errors across the cohort of 0.826 ± 0.172mm ASD, 5.882 ± 1.524mm DHD, and 0.912 ± 0.033 Dice score. Optimising the SW and BE hyperparameters improved the TSFFD performance in tracking LA features, with case specific optimisations giving errors across the cohort of 0.750 ± 0.144mm ASD, 5.096 ± 1.246mm DHD, and 0.919 ± 0.029 Dice score. Increasing the CP resolution and optimising the SW and BE further improved tracking performance, with case specific optimisation errors of 0.372 ± 0.051mm ASD, 2.739 ± 0.843mm DHD and 0.949 ± 0.018 Dice score across the cohort. We therefore show LA feature tracking using TSFFDs is improved through a chamber-specific optimised configuration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.