Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35727857›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Sequence learning, prediction, and replay in networks of spiking neurons.

Younes Bouhadjar, Dirk J Wouters, Markus Diesmann, Tom Tetzlaff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Younes BouhadjarInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6), & Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), & JARA BRAIN Institute Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4367-8236
Dirk J WoutersInstitute of Electronic Materials (IWE 2) & JARA-FIT, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-8553
Markus DiesmannInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6), & Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), & JARA BRAIN Institute Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2308-5727
Tom TetzlaffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6), & Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), & JARA BRAIN Institute Structure-Function Relationships (INM-10), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5794-5425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence learning, prediction and replay have been proposed to constitute the universal computations performed by the neocortex. The Hierarchical Temporal Memory (HTM) algorithm realizes these forms of computation. It learns sequences in an unsupervised and continuous manner using local learning rules, permits a context specific prediction of future sequence elements, and generates mismatch signals in case the predictions are not met. While the HTM algorithm accounts for a number of biological features such as topographic receptive fields, nonlinear dendritic processing, and sparse connectivity, it is based on abstract discrete-time neuron and synapse dynamics, as well as on plasticity mechanisms that can only partly be related to known biological mechanisms. Here, we devise a continuous-time implementation of the temporal-memory (TM) component of the HTM algorithm, which is based on a recurrent network of spiking neurons with biophysically interpretable variables and parameters. The model learns high-order sequences by means of a structural Hebbian synaptic plasticity mechanism supplemented with a rate-based homeostatic control. In combination with nonlinear dendritic input integration and local inhibitory feedback, this type of plasticity leads to the dynamic self-organization of narrow sequence-specific subnetworks. These subnetworks provide the substrate for a faithful propagation of sparse, synchronous activity, and, thereby, for a robust, context specific prediction of future sequence elements as well as for the autonomous replay of previously learned sequences. By strengthening the link to biology, our implementation facilitates the evaluation of the TM hypothesis based on experimentally accessible quantities. The continuous-time implementation of the TM algorithm permits, in particular, an investigation of the role of sequence timing for sequence learning, prediction and replay. We demonstrate this aspect by studying the effect of the sequence speed on the sequence learning performance and on the speed of autonomous sequence replay.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerLearningNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID35727857
PMCPMC9273101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.