ArticlePloS one2022
A nonlinear correlation measure with applications to gene expression data.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Statistical Methods for Detecting Nonlinear Relationships in Gene Expression and Omics Data: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Enhancing genomic prediction accuracy in Huaxi cattle through integration of transcriptomic data and a self-attention-based SNP selection strategy.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Jejunum FABP6 expression and potential mechanism response to Salmonella Pullorum inoculation revealed by proteomic profiling and RT-PCR in Chinese Taihe black-bone silky fowls.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Gene expression inference based on graph neural networks using L1000 data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Characterizing diseases using genetic and clinical variables: A data analytics approach.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Identifying potential circulating miRNA biomarkers for the diagnosis and prediction of ovarian cancer using machine-learning approach: application of Boruta.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonlinear correlation exists in many types of biomedical data. Several types of pairwise gene expression in humans and other organisms show nonlinear correlation across time, e.g., genes involved in human T helper (Th17) cells differentiation, which motivated this study. The proposed procedure, called Kernelized correlation (Kc), first transforms nonlinear data on the plane via a function (kernel, usually nonlinear) to a high-dimensional (Hilbert) space. Next, we plug the transformed data into a classical correlation coefficient, e.g., Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), to yield a nonlinear correlation measure. The algorithm to compute Kc is developed and the R code is provided online. In three simulated nonlinear cases, when noise in data is moderate, Kc with the RBF kernel (Kc-RBF) outperforms Pearson's r and the well-known distance correlation (dCor). However, when noise in data is low, Pearson's r and dCor perform slightly better than (equivalently to) Kc-RBF in Case 1 and 3 (in Case 2); Kendall's tau performs worse than the aforementioned measures in all cases. In Application 1 to discover genes involved in the early Th17 cell differentiation, Kc is shown to detect the nonlinear correlations of four genes with IL17A (a known marker gene), while dCor detects nonlinear correlations of two pairs, and DESeq fails in all these pairs. Next, Kc outperforms Pearson's and dCor, in estimating the nonlinear correlation of negatively correlated gene pairs in yeast cell cycle regulation. In conclusion, Kc is a simple and competent procedure to measure pairwise nonlinear correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.