ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2023
Algorithms for Estimating Time-Locked Neural Response Components in Cortical Processing of Continuous Speech.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- "When the word ends, the story begins": word offsets improve encoding of natural speech in a MEG study.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Article
- Differential electroencephalography responses in speech perception between native and non-native speakers.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Eye movements track prioritized auditory features in selective attention to natural speech.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Article
- Eelbrain, a Python toolkit for time-continuous analysis with temporal response functions.eLife · 2023Article
- Familiarity of Background Music Modulates the Cortical Tracking of Target Speech at the "Cocktail Party".Brain sciences · 2022Article
- The effects of data quantity on performance of temporal response function analyses of natural speech processing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Temporal Response Function (TRF) is a linear model of neural activity time-locked to continuous stimuli, including continuous speech. TRFs based on speech envelopes typically have distinct components that have provided remarkable insights into the cortical processing of speech. However, current methods may lead to less than reliable estimates of single-subject TRF components. Here, we compare two established methods, in TRF component estimation, and also propose novel algorithms that utilize prior knowledge of these components, bypassing the full TRF estimation.
methodsWe compared two established algorithms, ridge and boosting, and two novel algorithms based on Subspace Pursuit (SP) and Expectation Maximization (EM), which directly estimate TRF components given plausible assumptions regarding component characteristics. Single-channel, multi-channel, and source-localized TRFs were fit on simulations and real magnetoencephalographic data. Performance metrics included model fit and component estimation accuracy.
resultsBoosting and ridge have comparable performance in component estimation. The novel algorithms outperformed the others in simulations, but not on real data, possibly due to the plausible assumptions not actually being met. Ridge had slightly better model fits on real data compared to boosting, but also more spurious TRF activity.
conclusionResults indicate that both smooth (ridge) and sparse (boosting) algorithms perform comparably at TRF component estimation. The SP and EM algorithms may be accurate, but rely on assumptions of component characteristics. SIGNIFICANCE: This systematic comparison establishes the suitability of widely used and novel algorithms for estimating robust TRF components, which is essential for improved subject-specific investigations into the cortical processing of speech.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.