Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35727622›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2022

Digitally Delivered Exercise and Education Treatment Program for Low Back Pain: Longitudinal Observational Cohort Study.

Helena Hörder, Håkan Nero, Majda Misini Ignjatovic, Ali Kiadaliri, L Stefan Lohmander, Leif E Dahlberg, Allan Abbott

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05226156 (Digitally Delivered Exercise and Education Treatment for Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05226156 completednot on this map

Digitally Delivered Exercise and Education Treatment for Low Back Pain: 3 Months Follow-up

TypeobservationalSponsorJoint AcademyRan2021 to 2022Enrolled2,593ConditionsPain, Physical FunctionArmsDigitally delivered exercise and education treatment Joint Academy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helena HörderDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6894-4858
Håkan NeroDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-7283
Majda Misini IgnjatovicDepartment of Science, Joint Academy, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6681-5155
Ali KiadaliriClinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-9099
L Stefan LohmanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5424-9448
Leif E DahlbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7838-9464
Allan AbbottUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4318-9216
Lund University · SELinköping University · SESwedish Academy · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise and education is recommended as first-line treatment by evidence-based, international guidelines for low back pain (LBP). Despite consensus regarding the treatment, there is a gap between guidelines and what is offered to patients. Digital LBP treatments are an emerging way of delivering first-line treatment.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes after participation in a 3-month digitally delivered treatment program for individuals with subacute or chronic LBP.

methodsWe analyzed data from 2593 consecutively recruited participants in a digitally delivered treatment program, available via the national health care system in Sweden. The program consists of video-instructed and progressive adaptable exercises, education through text lessons, and a chat and video function connecting participants with a personal physiotherapist. The primary outcome was mean change and proportion reaching a minimal clinically important change (MCIC) for LBP (2 points or 30% decrease) assessed with the numerical rating scale (average pain during the past week, discrete boxes, 0-10, best to worst). Secondary outcomes were mean change and proportion reaching MCIC (10 points or 30%) in disability, assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; 0-100, best to worst) and a question on patient acceptable symptom state (PASS).

resultsThe mean participant age was 63 years, 73.85% (1915/2593) were female, 54.72% (1419/2593) had higher education, 50.56% (1311/2593) were retired, and the mean BMI was 26.5 kg/m2. Participants completed on average 84% of the prescribed exercises and lessons, with an adherence of ≥80% in 69.26% (1796/2593) and ≥90% in 50.13% (1300/2593) of the participants. Mean reduction in pain from baseline to 3 months was 1.7 (95% CI -1.8 to -1.6), corresponding to a 35% relative change. MCIC was reached by 58.50% (1517/2593) of participants. ODI decreased 4 points (95% CI -4.5 to -3.7), and 36.48% (946/2593) reached an MCIC. A change from no to yes in PASS was seen in 30.35% (787/2593) of participants. Multivariable analysis showed positive associations between reaching an MCIC in pain and high baseline pain (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% CI 1.6-2.1), adherence (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.8), and motivation (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.5), while we found negative associations for wish for surgery (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.9) and pain in other joints (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-0.9). We found no associations between sociodemographic characteristics and pain reduction.

conclusionsParticipants in this digitally delivered treatment for LBP had reduced pain at 3-month follow-up, and 58.50% (1517/2593) reported an MCIC in pain. Our findings suggest that digital treatment programs can reduce pain at clinically important levels for people with high adherence to treatment but that those with such severe LBP problems that they wish to undergo surgery may benefit from additional support.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05226156; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05226156.

Indexed as

back painchronic paindigital caredigital therapyexercisehealth outcomelow back painpain managementphysiotherapyrehabilitationtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35727622
PMCPMC9257621
OpenAlexW4281620202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.