Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35727503›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022

Current Controversies in Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy.

Amanda Avila, Kinjal Vasavada, Dhruv S Shankar, Massimo Petrera, Laith M Jazrawi, Eric J Strauss

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Outside-in repair technique is effective in traumatic tears of the meniscus in active adults: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Can we Predict the Outcomes of Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy?Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Update on Meniscal Injury Treatment.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  11. [Update on Meniscal Injury Treatment].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda AvilaDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. amanda.avila@nyulangone.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-7863
Kinjal VasavadaDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Dhruv S ShankarDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Massimo PetreraDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Laith M JazrawiDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Eric J StraussDivision of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGiven the continued controversy among orthopedic surgeons regarding the indications and benefits of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM), this review summarizes the current literature, indications, and outcomes of partial meniscectomy to treat symptomatic meniscal tears. RECENT

findingsIn patients with symptomatic meniscal tears, the location and tear pattern play a vital role in clinical management. Tears in the central white-white zone are less amenable to repair due to poor vascularity. Patients may be indicated for APM or non-surgical intervention depending on the tear pattern and symptoms. Non-surgical management for meniscal pathology includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), physical therapy (PT), and intraarticular injections to reduce inflammation and relieve symptoms. There have been several landmark multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the outcomes of APM compared to PT or sham surgery in symptomatic degenerative meniscal tears. These most notably include the 2013 Meniscal Tear in Osteoarthritis Research (MeTeOR) Trial, the 2018 ESCAPE trial, and the sham surgery-controlled Finnish Degenerative Meniscal Lesion Study (FIDELITY), which failed to identify substantial benefits of APM over nonoperative treatment or even placebo surgery. Despite an abundance of literature exploring outcomes of APM for degenerative meniscus tears, there is little consensus among surgeons about the drivers of good outcomes following APM. It is often difficult to determine if the presenting symptoms are secondary to the meniscus pathology or the degenerative disease in patients with concomitant OA. A central tenet of managing meniscal pathology is to preserve tissue whenever possible. Most RCTs show that exercise therapy may be non-inferior to APM in degenerative tears if repair is not possible. Given this evidence, patients who fail nonoperative treatment should be counseled regarding the risks of APM before proceeding to surgical management.

Indexed as

Arthroscopic partial meniscectomyDegenerative tearMeniscal tearOsteoarthritisPhysical therapySham surgeryTraumatic tear

Identifiers

PMID35727503
PMCPMC9463417
OpenAlexW4283264990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.