Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35727495›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2022

Secondary genomic findings in the 2020 China Neonatal Genomes Project participants.

Hui Xiao, Jian-Tao Zhang, Xin-Ran Dong, Yu-Lan Lu, Bing-Bing Wu, Hui-Jun Wang, Zheng-Yan Zhao, Lin Yang, Wen-Hao Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui XiaoDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian-Tao ZhangDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xin-Ran DongCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Lan LuCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bing-Bing WuCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hui-Jun WangCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zheng-Yan ZhaoDepartment of Child Health Care, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Lin YangCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. linyang09@fudan.edu.cn.
Wen-Hao ZhouDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. zhouwenhao@fudan.edu.cn.
Children's Hospital of Fudan University · CNChildren's Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring next generation sequencing (NGS) data interpretation in critically ill newborns, there is a potential for recognizing and reporting secondary findings (SFs). Early awareness of SFs may provide clues for disease prevention. In this study, we assessed the frequency of SFs in the China Neonatal Genomes Project (CNGP) participants.

methodsA total of 2020 clinical exome sequencing (CES) datasets were screened for variants from a list of 59 genes recommended by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) for secondary findings reporting v2.0 (ACMG SF v2.0). Identified variants were classified according to the evidence-based guidelines reached by a joint consensus of the ACMG and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP).

resultsAmong the 2020 CES datasets, we identified 23 ACMG-reportable genes in 61 individuals, resulting in an overall frequency of SFs at 3.02%. A total of 53 unique variants were identified, including 35 pathogenic and 18 likely pathogenic variants. The common disease categories of SFs associated were cardiovascular and cancer disease. The SF results affected the medical management and follow-up strategy in 49 (80.3%) patients.

conclusionsWe presented the frequency of SFs and their impact on clinical management strategies in CNGP participants. Our study demonstrated that SFs have important practical value in disease prevention and intervention at an early stage.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingNeoplasmsGenetic VariationGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansInfant, NewbornGenetics secondary findingsNeonateNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35727495
OpenAlexW4283209795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.