Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35727485›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2023

Robotic operations in urgent general surgery: a systematic review.

Alexander Reinisch, Juliane Liese, Winfried Padberg, Frank Ulrich

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander Reinisch *Department of General, Visceral and Oncologic Surgery, Wetzlar Hospital and Clinics, Forsthausstr. 1, 35578, Wetzlar, Germany. Alexander_reinisch@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5233-0648
Juliane Liese *Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Winfried Padberg *Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic, Transplant and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Frank Ulrich *Department of General, Visceral and Oncologic Surgery, Wetzlar Hospital and Clinics, Forsthausstr. 1, 35578, Wetzlar, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEDanaher (Germany) · DEFord (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotically assisted operations are the state of the art in laparoscopic general surgery. They are established predominantly for elective operations. Since laparoscopy is widely used in urgent general surgery, the significance of robotic assistance in urgent operations is of interest. Currently, there are few data on robotic-assisted operations in urgent surgery. The aim of this study was to collect and classify the existing studies. A two-stage, PRISMA-compliant literature search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted. We analyzed all articles on robotic surgery associated with urgent general surgery resp. acute surgical diseases of the abdomen. Gynecological and urological diseases so as vascular surgery, except mesenterial ischemia, were excluded. Studies and case reports/series published between 1980 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion. In addition to a descriptive synopsis, various outcome parameters were systematically recorded. Fifty-two studies of operations for acute appendicitis and cholecystitis, hernias and acute conditions of the gastrointestinal tract were included. The level of evidence is low. Surgical robots in the narrow sense and robotic camera mounts were used. All narrow-sense robots are nonautonomous systems; in 82%, the Da Vinci

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresCholecystectomyHerniaHumansEmergency surgeryGeneral surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryRobotic surgeryUrgent surgery

Identifiers

PMID35727485
PMCPMC10076409
OpenAlexW4283218189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.