Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35727416›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2023

In vitro evaluation of the effects of methanolic plant extracts on the embryonation rate of Ascaridia galli eggs.

Ioanna Poulopoulou, Mark James Horgan, Bianka Siewert, Michaela Siller, Luisa Palmieri, Eftychia Martinidou, Stefan Martens, Pietro Fusani, Veronika Temml, Hermann Stuppner and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of Novel β-Tubulin Inhibitors Using a CombinedJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioanna PoulopoulouFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100, Bolzano, Italy. Ioanna.Poulopoulou@unibz.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8272-3453
Mark James HorganInstitute of Pharmacy/Pharmacognosy, Center for Chemistry and Biomedicine, University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bianka SiewertInstitute of Pharmacy/Pharmacognosy, Center for Chemistry and Biomedicine, University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michaela SillerResearch and Innovation Center, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via E. Mach 1 38010 - San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Luisa PalmieriResearch and Innovation Center, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via E. Mach 1 38010 - San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Eftychia MartinidouResearch and Innovation Center, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via E. Mach 1 38010 - San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Stefan MartensResearch and Innovation Center, Edmund Mach Foundation, Via E. Mach 1 38010 - San Michele all'Adige, Trento, Italy.
Pietro FusaniConsiglio Per La Ricerca in Agricoltura E L'analisi Dell'economia Agraria, Centro Di Ricerca Foreste E Legno, piazza Nicolini 6 loc. Villazzano, 38123, Trento, Italy.
Veronika TemmlInstitute of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Hermann StuppnerInstitute of Pharmacy/Pharmacognosy, Center for Chemistry and Biomedicine, University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Matthias GaulyFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100, Bolzano, Italy.
Fondazione Edmund Mach · ITUniversität Innsbruck · ATFree University of Bozen-Bolzano · ITCentro di Ricerca per l’Orticoltura · ITParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

Europaregion Tirol - Trentino - Alto Adige IPN 119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aims to find efficient alternatives to synthetic anthelmintics among ethno-veterinary herbs. Ascaridia galli eggs isolated from the worm uterus were exposed in vitro to methanolic extracts (ME) of nine plant species such as Achillea millefolium (AM), Artemisia absinthium (AA), Artemisia vulgaris (AV), Cicerbita alpina (CA), Cichorium intybus (CI), Inula helenium (IH), Origanum vulgare (OV), Tanacetum vulgare (TV), Tanacetum parthenium (TP). Flubendazole (FL), 0.5% formalin with dimethylsulfoxide and Petri dishes without the addition of reagents were used as positive, negative and untreated control respectively. The effects of the different ME at concentrations 0.500, 0.325, 0.200 mg/ml were assessed on the embryonic development (ED) of the eggs in duplicate. Logit analysis was used to calculate EC

Indexed as

AscaridiaMebendazoleAnimalsDimethyl SulfoxideFemaleFormaldehydeMethanolDimethyl SulfoxideflubendazoleFormaldehydeMebendazoleMethanolAnthelmintic activityAscaridia galliHerbsLaying hens

Identifiers

PMID35727416
OpenAlexW4283213853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.