Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35727218›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2022

Diaphragm impairment in patients admitted for severe COVID-19.

Laura López-Viñas, Juan Vega-Villar, Esmeralda Rocío-Martín, Patricia García-García, Elena De La Rosa Santiago, Jose María Galván-Román, Rybel Wix-Ramos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. COVID-19 management in Iran and international sanctions.European journal of translational myology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura López-ViñasNeurophysiology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid. lauralvinas@hotmail.com.
Juan Vega-VillarRadiology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid. juanvegavillar@gmail.com.
Esmeralda Rocío-MartínNeurophysiology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid. erociomartin@hotmail.es.
Patricia García-GarcíaRadiology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid. patriciagarc@hotmail.com.
Elena De La Rosa SantiagoNeurophysiology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid. elenarosa.santiago@gmail.com.
Jose María Galván-RománInternal Medicine Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid. jm.galvanroman@gmail.com.
Rybel Wix-RamosNeurophysiology Department, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid. rybelwix@hotmail.com.
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among patients affected by the virus COVID-19, physicians have observed ventilation disorders. It is relevant to assess neurological involvement, including the role of diaphragmatic function. Its possible impairment could be related to the systemic inflammatory response and disease progression that both typify COVID-19 infection. We distinguished two groups (severe group (SG) and mild group (MG)) according to the severity of respiratory symptomatology. We performed neurophysiological and sonography studies to evaluate the diaphragmatic function. Regarding the sonography variables, we identified statistically significant differences in the right mean diaphragmatic thickness along with the expiration, showing 1.56 mm (SEM: 0.11) in the SG vs 1.92 mm (SEM: 0.19) in the MG (p = 0.042). The contractibility of both hemidiaphragms was 15% lower in the severe group, though this difference is not statistically significant. In our examination of the neurophysiological variables, in the amplitude responses, we observed a greater difference between responses from both phrenic nerves as follows: the raw differences in amplitude were 0.40 μV (SEM: 0.14) in the SG vs 0.35 μV (SEM: 0.19) in the MG and the percentage difference was 25.92% (SEM: 7.22) in the SG vs 16.28% (SEM: 4.38%) in the MG. Although diaphragmatic dysfunction is difficult to detect, our combined functional and morphological approach with phrenic electroneurograms and chest ultrasounds could improve diagnostic sensitivity. We suggest that diaphragmatic dysfunction could play a relevant role in respiratory disturbance in hospitalised patients with severe COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID35727218
PMCPMC9295177
OpenAlexW4283216129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.