Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35727159›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

A time-motion study of the COVID-19 vaccination process in an urban primary health center of Odisha, India.

G Alekhya, Prajna Paramita Giri, Arjun M C, Binod Kumar Behera, Sonu Hangma Subba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G AlekhyaDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8980-6734
Prajna Paramita GiriDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7062-0916
Arjun M CDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7929-511X
Binod Kumar BeheraDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8113-5289
Sonu Hangma SubbaDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5598-9088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is a critical tool in protecting against COVID-19. It is essential to know the time for each activity in a COVID-19 vaccination process for better management, especially during a pandemic. Thus, we conducted a time-motion study to identify activities that led to delayed/increased waiting time in an urban primary health center in Bhubaneswar, India. We observed 196 COVID-19 vaccine beneficiaries over one month (June 2021) from when they arrived at the vaccination center until they left the center. A data collection form and a Stopwatch were used to estimate the time taken for various activities involved in COVID-19 vaccine delivery. The time taken was expressed in mean and median. We also compared the time taken during the first and second doses using the Mann-Whitney U test. The total mean time spent at the vaccination center was 40:56 ± 20:52 minutes. The activity that took the longest was 'waiting time in queue before vaccination', which was 34:22 ± 20:56 min constituting 82% of the total time. The activity that took longer for the second dose than the first was the beneficiary verification in the Co-WIN portal with a median of 27 seconds and 36 seconds, respectively (p < .001). This study will help program managers formulate better strategies to improve the vaccination process making it more efficient.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth FacilitiesHumansPandemicsVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19policymakingpublic healthvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35727159
PMCPMC9359350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.