ArticleJournal of applied biomedicine2022
Kilohertz alternating current neuromodulation of the pudendal nerves: effects on the anal canal and anal sphincter in rats.
Article in Journal of applied biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first two objectives were to establish which stimulation parameters of kilohertz frequency alternating current (KHFAC) neuromodulation influence the effectiveness of pudendal nerve block and its safety. The third aim was to determine whether KHFAC neuromodulation of the pudendal nerve can relax the pelvic musculature, including the anal sphincter. Simulation experiments were conducted to establish which parameters can be adjusted to improve the effectiveness and safety of the nerve block. The outcome measures were block threshold (measure of effectiveness) and block threshold charge per phase (measure of safety). In vivo, the pudendal nerves in 11 male and 2 female anesthetized Sprague Dawley rats were stimulated in the range of 10 Hz to 40 kHz, and the effect on anal pressure was measured. The simulations showed that block threshold and block threshold charge per phase depend on waveform, interphase delay, electrode-to-axon distance, interpolar distance, and electrode array orientation. In vivo, the average anal pressure during unilateral KHFAC stimulation was significantly lower than the average peak anal pressure during low-frequency stimulation (p < 0.001). Stimulation with 20 kHz and 40 kHz (square wave, 10 V amplitude, 50% duty cycle, no interphase delay) induced the largest anal pressure decrease during both unilateral and bilateral stimulation. However, no statistically significant differences were detected between the different frequencies. This study showed that waveform, interphase delay and the alignment of the electrode along the nerve affect the effectiveness and safety of KHFAC stimulation. Additionally, we showed that KHFAC neuromodulation of the pudendal nerves with an electrode array effectively reduces anal pressure in rats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.