Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726866›Full record

ArticleInternational health2023

Development and validation of a Perceived Relocation Stress Scale for older individuals transferred to long-term care facilities in Taiwan.

Shu-Ming Chen, Chiung-Jung Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shu-Ming ChenSchool of Nursing, Fooyin University, 151 Jinxue Road, Dailao Dist., Kaohsiung City, 83102, Taiwan.
Chiung-Jung WuSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of Sunshine Coast, 1 Moreton Parade, Petrie, QLD 4502, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6512-9049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the current study was to develop and validate a Perceived Relocation Stress Scale.

methodsA cross-sectional research design was used. A total of 175 older adults residing in long-term care facilities in Southern Taiwan for at least 1 y were recruited. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to examine item convergent and discriminant validity. Concurrent validity was checked using the Depression Anxiety and Stress scale. The reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients.

resultsThe face and content validity of the scale were verified by adequately measuring the scale items. Factor analysis consisted of four components (challenge/chance, positive appraisal, threat, loss), with a total variance of 67.35%. The content validity was determined by an expert panel to systematically examine the relevance of all items. The results of item convergent and discriminant validity supported the constructs of the scale. The alpha coefficient for the overall scale was .958, indicating good internal consistency reliability.

conclusionsThe Perceived Relocation Stress Scale is a reliable and valid measurement to assess the stress perceived by older individuals being transferred to a long-term care facility.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesLong-Term CareAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwanfactor analysislong-term care facilityperceived relocation stressreliabilityscalevalidity

Identifiers

PMID35726866
PMCPMC10318972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.