Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726853›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

Addition of probenecid to oral β-lactam antibiotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Richard C Wilson, Paul Arkell, Alaa Riezk, Mark Gilchrist, Graham Wheeler, William Hope, Alison H Holmes, Timothy M Rawson

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Richard C WilsonNational Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
Paul ArkellCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, Acton, London W12 0NN, UK.
Alaa RiezkCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, Acton, London W12 0NN, UK.
Mark GilchristNational Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
Graham WheelerImperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, Stadium House, Wood Lane, London W12 7RH, UK.
William HopeCentre for Excellence in Infectious Diseases Research (CEIDR), University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7 8TX, UK.
Alison H HolmesNational Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
Timothy M RawsonNational Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2630-9722
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

CAMOCentre for Antimicrobial Optimisation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the literature comparing the pharmacokinetic and clinical outcomes from adding probenecid to oral β-lactams.

methodsMedline and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 2021 for all English language studies comparing the addition of probenecid (intervention) with an oral β-lactam [flucloxacillin, penicillin V, amoxicillin (± clavulanate), cefalexin, cefuroxime axetil] alone (comparator). ROBINS-I and ROB-2 tools were used. Data on antibiotic therapy, infection diagnosis, primary and secondary outcomes relating to pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes, plus adverse events were extracted and reported descriptively. For a subset of studies comparing treatment failure between probenecid and control groups, meta-analysis was performed.

resultsOverall, 18/295 (6%) screened abstracts were included. Populations, methodology and outcome data were heterogeneous. Common populations included healthy volunteers (9/18; 50%) and those with gonococcal infection (6/18; 33%). Most studies were crossover trials (11/18; 61%) or parallel-arm randomized trials (4/18; 22%). Where pharmacokinetic analyses were performed, addition of probenecid to oral β-lactams increased total AUC (7/7; 100%), Cmax (5/8; 63%) and serum t½ (6/8; 75%). Probenecid improved PTA (2/2; 100%). Meta-analysis of 3105 (2258 intervention, 847 control) patients treated for gonococcal disease demonstrated a relative risk of treatment failure in the random-effects model of 0.33 (95% CI 0.20-0.55; I2 = 7%), favouring probenecid.

conclusionsProbenecid-boosted β-lactam therapy is associated with improved outcomes in gonococcal disease. Pharmacokinetic data suggest that probenecid-boosted oral β-lactam therapy may have a broader application, but appropriately powered mechanistic and efficacy studies are required.

Indexed as

GonorrheaProbenecidAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsHumansMonobactamsAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsMonobactamsProbenecid

Identifiers

PMID35726853
PMCPMC9721384
OpenAlexW4283211799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.