Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726841›Full record

ArticleNursing in critical care2022

Development of a non-pharmacologic delirium management bundle in paediatric intensive care units.

Rikke Louise Stenkjaer, Suzanne Forsyth Herling, Ingrid Egerod, Janne Weis, Monique van Dijk, Sapna Ravi Kudchadkar, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Erwin Ista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing in critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rikke Louise StenkjaerDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6831-7376
Suzanne Forsyth HerlingThe Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ingrid EgerodDepartment of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-4390
Janne WeisDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Monique van DijkDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Intensive care, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sapna Ravi KudchadkarAnesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Pediatrics, and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Associate Vice Chair for Research, ACCM, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Charlotte Bloomberg Children's Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Anne-Sylvie RameletInstitute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8809-2920
Erwin IstaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1257-3108

Funding

Department of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Intensive care, Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's HospitalNovo Nordisk Fonden NNF 20OC0066074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-pharmacologic interventions might be effective to reduce the incidence of delirium in pediatric intensive care units (PICU).

aimTo explore expert opinions and generate informed consensus decisions regarding the content of a non-pharmacologic delirium bundle to manage delirium in PICU patients. STUDY

designA two-round online Delphi study was conducted from February to April 2021. PICU experts (nurses, physicians, researchers, physical therapists, play specialists, and occupational therapists) located in Europe, North America, South America, Asia, and Australia participated.

resultsWe developed a questionnaire based on the outcomes of a comprehensive literature search in the domains: 1) cognition support; 2) sleep support; and 3) physical activity support. Under these domains, we listed 11 strategies to promote support with 61 interventions. Participants rated the feasibility of each intervention on a 9-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 strongly disagree to 9 strongly agree). A disagreement index and panel median were calculated to determine the level of agreement among experts. In the second round, participants reassessed the revised statements and ranked the interventions in each domain in order of importance for age groups: 0-2, 3-5, and 6-18 years of age. During the first Delphi round, 53 of 74 (72%) questionnaires were completed, and in the second round 45 of 74 (61%) were completed. Five of the highest ranked interventions across the age groups were: 1) developing a daily routine, 2) adjusting light exposure according to the time of day, 3) scheduling time for sleep, 4) providing eyeglasses and hearing aids if appropriate, 5) encouraging parental presence.

conclusionsBased on expert consensus, we developed an age-specific non-pharmacologic delirium bundle of interventions to manage delirium in PICU patients. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: An age-specific Non-Pharmacological Delirium bundle is now ready to be tested in the PICU and will hopefully reduce pediatric delirium.

Indexed as

DeliriumAustraliaChildHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care UnitsIntensive Care Units, PediatricSleepSurveys and Questionnairesdeliriumdelphi studymanagementnon-pharmacologicalpaediatric intensive care unit

Identifiers

PMID35726841
PMCPMC10084175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.