Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726629›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Heart failure2022

Donor Utilization in the Recent Era: Effect of Sex, Drugs, and Increased Risk.

David A Baran, Ashleigh Long, Justin Lansinger, Jack G Copeland, Hannah Copeland

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Heart Transplant: Challenge Accepted.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David A BaranAdvanced Heart Failure Section, Division of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Weston, FL (D.A.B.).ORCID 0000-0002-7754-9953
Ashleigh LongDivision of Cardiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa (A.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-0190-6707
Justin LansingerInternal Medicine Training Program, University of Rochester, NY (J.L.).ORCID 0000-0003-4880-5476
Jack G CopelandDepartment of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson (J.G.C.).
Hannah CopelandDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Fort Wayne (H.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-3753-5194
Cleveland Clinic Florida · USIndiana University Fort Wayne · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Rochester · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart transplantation volumes have increased in recent years, yet less than a third of donors are typically accepted for transplantation. Whether donor sex, donor drug use, or perception of increased risk affects utilization for transplantation is unclear.

methodsThe United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for donors from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. Donor toxicology was collected when available. Multivariate analysis was conducted to examine correlations with donor utilization.

resultsBetween January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017, there were 87 816 heart donors aged ≥15 years. The mean age was 42.7±15.8 years, and 24 831 donors (28.3%) were utilized for heart transplantation. Subsequent analyses focused on donors between 15 and 39 years old. The strongest associations with donor acceptance were for male donor sex, blood type, hepatitis C antibody, donor age, left ventricular hypertrophy, and history of donor drug use. After removing hepatitis C, Public Health Service Increased Risk was identified as a strong negative predictor. Most positive drug toxicology results were associated with donor nonuse except for donors between 15 and 19 years of age. Exceptions included alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine. Opiates were associated with less utilization at all donor ages. The Public Health Service Increased Risk status was associated with significantly less utilization in all age groups except 15- to 19-year-old donors.

conclusionsWhile male donors were preferentially utilized, donors with drug use or those deemed Public Health Service Increased Risk were significantly less utilized for heart transplantation. Further consideration of such donors would be appropriate particularly as the demand for transplantation continues to increase.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHeart TransplantationHepatitis CAdolescentAdultDonor SelectionHumansMaleMiddle AgedTissue DonorsYoung Adultcannabisheart transplantationhepatitis Cmultivariate analysistissue donors

Identifiers

PMID35726629
PMCPMC9287105
OpenAlexW4283265620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.