Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726386›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2022

Considerations for developing supportive care interventions for survivors of head and neck cancer: A qualitative study.

Laura B Oswald, Brandy Arredondo, Carley Geiss, Taylor F D Vigoureux, Aasha I Hoogland, Christine H Chung, Jameel Muzaffar, Krupal B Patel, Brian D Gonzalez, Heather S L Jim and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Postradiation trismus in head and neck cancer survivors: a qualitative study of effects on life, rehabilitation, used coping strategies and support from the healthcare system.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Psychosocial consequences of head and neck cancer symptom burden after chemoradiation: a mixed-method study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura B OswaldDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6281-2512
Brandy ArredondoParticipant Research, Interventions, and Measurement Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Carley GeissParticipant Research, Interventions, and Measurement Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Taylor F D VigoureuxSchool of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Aasha I HooglandDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8691-8132
Christine H ChungDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Jameel MuzaffarDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Krupal B PatelDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Brian D GonzalezDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-5735
Heather S L JimDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7353-3711
Kedar KirtaneDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1302-9577

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to describe considerations for developing supportive care interventions targeted to head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors.

methodsOne-time semi-structured interviews (N = 33) were conducted with HNC survivors who had recently finished treatment (n = 20) and HNC providers (e.g., physicians, nurses; n = 13). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using inductive applied thematic analysis techniques to identify themes.

resultsHNC survivors (75% male; M = 61 years old) and providers (54% physicians; 62% female) were unanimously supportive of developing HNC-specific supportive care interventions. Participants described potential benefits of offering interventions at various points throughout the HNC treatment and survivorship trajectory rather than at a single critical time. Many participants preferred group-based interventions because of the high value of peer-support. Others described how group interventions may not be appropriate for all HNC survivors due to risks for negative social comparisons and exacerbated anxiety. Participants suggested topics that should be addressed in HNC-specific interventions including education about acute and long-term side effects, symptom management, nutritional support, relationship/social role changes, grief/loss, and fear of recurrence.

conclusionsHNC-specific supportive care interventions are critically needed, as survivors experience persistent symptoms and distinct psychosocial concerns that impact quality of life. Findings from this study can inform the development of supportive care interventions targeted to the unique psychosocial concerns of HNC survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHead and Neck NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurvivorsSurvivorshipcancerhead and neck neoplasmsoncologypalliative supportive carepsychosocial interventionqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35726386
PMCPMC9452460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.