Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726357›Full record

ReviewMaternal & child nutrition2022

Social assistance programme impacts on women's and children's diets and nutritional status.

Deanna K Olney, Aulo Gelli, Neha Kumar, Harold Alderman, Ara Go, Ahmed Raza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Deanna K OlneyPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-8565
Aulo GelliPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4977-2549
Neha KumarPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, United States.
Harold AldermanPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, United States.
Ara GoPoverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, United States.
Ahmed RazaFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
International Food Policy Research Institute · USFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investments in social assistance programmes (SAPs) have accelerated alongside interest in using SAPs to improve health and nutrition outcomes. However, evidence of how design features within and across programme types influence the effectiveness of SAPs for improving diet and nutrition outcomes among women and children is limited. To address this, we reviewed evaluations of cash, in-kind and voucher programmes conducted between 2010 and 2020 among women and children, and examined associations between design features (targeting, including household and individual transfers, fortified foods and behaviour change communication) and positive impacts on diet (diet diversity, micronutrient intake) and nutrition (anthropometric indicators, haemoglobin, anaemia) outcomes. Our review has several key findings. First, SAPs improve dietary diversity and intake of micronutrient-rich foods among women and children, as well as improve several nutrition outcomes. Second, SAPs were more likely to impact diet and nutrition outcomes among women compared with children (23/45 [51%] vs. 52/144 [36%] of outcomes measured). Third, in-kind (all but one of which included fortified foods) compared with cash transfer programmes were more likely to significantly increase women's body mass index and children's weight-for-height/length Z-score, and both women's and children's haemoglobin and anaemia. However, there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of SAPs for improving micronutrient status and preventing increased prevalence of overweight and obesity for all populations and for improving diet and nutrition outcomes among men, adolescents and the elderly. Further research in these areas is urgently needed to optimize impact of SAPs on diet and nutrition outcomes as countries increase investments in SAPs.

Indexed as

AnemiaNutritional StatusAdolescentAgedChildDietFemaleFood, FortifiedHumansMaleMicronutrientsMicronutrientschildrendietary diversitymicronutrient intakenutritional statussocial assistancesocial protectionwomen

Identifiers

PMID35726357
PMCPMC9480902
OpenAlexW4283205724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.