ReviewACS nanoscience Au2022
Electronic Quantum Materials Simulated with Artificial Model Lattices.
Review in ACS nanoscience Au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- An organic array of quantum corrals modulated by the gold herringbone electronic superlattice.Nanoscale · 2025Article
- Moiré band structure engineering using a twisted boron nitride substrate.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Artificial kagome lattices of Shockley surface states patterned by halogen hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Halide Perovskite Artificial Solids as a New Platform to Simulate Collective Phenomena in Doped Mott Insulators.Nano letters · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The band structure and electronic properties of a material are defined by the sort of elements, the atomic registry in the crystal, the dimensions, the presence of spin-orbit coupling, and the electronic interactions. In natural crystals, the interplay of these factors is difficult to unravel, since it is usually not possible to vary one of these factors in an independent way, keeping the others constant. In other words, a complete understanding of complex electronic materials remains challenging to date. The geometry of two- and one-dimensional crystals can be mimicked in artificial lattices. Moreover, geometries that do not exist in nature can be created for the sake of further insight. Such engineered artificial lattices can be better controlled and fine-tuned than natural crystals. This makes it easier to vary the lattice geometry, dimensions, spin-orbit coupling, and interactions independently from each other. Thus, engineering and characterization of artificial lattices can provide unique insights. In this Review, we focus on artificial lattices that are built atom-by-atom on atomically flat metals, using atomic manipulation in a scanning tunneling microscope. Cryogenic scanning tunneling microscopy allows for consecutive creation, microscopic characterization, and band-structure analysis by tunneling spectroscopy, amounting in the analogue quantum simulation of a given lattice type. We first review the physical elements of this method. We then discuss the creation and characterization of artificial atoms and molecules. For the lattices, we review works on honeycomb and Lieb lattices and lattices that result in crystalline topological insulators, such as the Kekulé and "breathing" kagome lattice. Geometric but nonperiodic structures such as electronic quasi-crystals and fractals are discussed as well. Finally, we consider the option to transfer the knowledge gained back to real materials, engineered by geometric patterning of semiconductor quantum wells.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.