Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726263›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2022

Efficacy of a Self-Designed Questionnaire for Community Screening of COPD.

Shuang Yang, Xin Yin, Yanan Zhang, Hanwei Zhao, Zixuan Zheng, Junqing Li, Xiaoying Hu, Juan Xie, Zhijun Jie, Na Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shuang Yang *Department of General Medicine, Jiangchuan Community Healthcare Service Center of Minhang District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7952-1340
Xin Yin *Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2808-7908
Yanan ZhangDepartment of General Medicine, Zhuanqiao Community Healthcare Service Center of Minhang District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hanwei ZhaoDepartment of General Medicine, Zhuanqiao Community Healthcare Service Center of Minhang District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zixuan ZhengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Junqing LiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoying HuDepartment of General Medicine, Jiangchuan Community Healthcare Service Center of Minhang District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Juan XieDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhijun JieDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Na WangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jindong ShiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Fudan University · CNCommunity Health Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the screening efficacy of a self-designed questionnaire for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the potential gender disparity in its efficacy. Patients and Methods: A screening questionnaire, the COPD Screening Questionnaire-Minhang (COPD-MH), was designed with reference to the self-scored COPD population screener (COPD-PS) and the COPD screening questionnaire (COPD-SQ), incorporating characteristics of the local population in Shanghai, China. The revised questionnaire included only five questions. Each question scored 0-4, with a highest total score of 20. The COPD-PS and COPD-SQ comprised 5 and 7 questions, respectively. Their scoring criteria were not consecutive integers and, thus, not easily counted. The COPD-MH focused on symptoms, and each item was set the same answers for convenience. Screening for COPD was conducted among residents over 40 years old in a community in Shanghai using the three aforementioned questionnaires. Each participant also received spirometry tests. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the validity of each questionnaire. Results: A total of 1197 community residents in Minhang District completed the screening. A total of 1023 participants were finally included in analysis with a detected prevalence of 12.4% for COPD. The best cut-off values for the COPD-PS, COPD-SQ, and COPD-MH were 4, 16, and 7 points, respectively. The AUCs for these three questionnaires were >0.5, but the sensitivity of the COPD-MH was higher than those of the COPD-PS and COPD-SQ. The sensitivity of COPD-MH was 80.77% for males and 77.5% for females. The COPD-MH had higher diagnostic efficiency and higher sensitivity with gender-specific cut-off values. Conclusion: The COPD-MH is comparable to and less time-consuming than the existing screening methods for COPD. Gender-related factors affect the optimal cut-off values of the COPD screening questionnaire, and rectifying this can improve the practical screening efficacy.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningSpirometrySurveys and Questionnaireschronic obstructive pulmonary diseasegenderROC curvescreening questionnairespirometry

Identifiers

PMID35726263
PMCPMC9206516
OpenAlexW4282839070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.