Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726231›Full record

ArticleAMRC open research2022

A feasibility pilot study of the effects of neurostimulation on swallowing function in Parkinson's Disease [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations, 1 not approved].

Ayodele Sasegbon, Ulrike Hammerbeck, Emilia Michou, Ivy Cheng, Mengqing Zhang, Charlotte James, Shaheen Hamdy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMRC open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayodele SasegbonDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2050-0726
Ulrike HammerbeckDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2657-4347
Emilia MichouDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7245-0882
Ivy ChengDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5853-7976
Mengqing ZhangDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK.
Charlotte JamesDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK.
Shaheen HamdyDivision of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9640-7427
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of Patras · GR

Funding

Parkinson's UK G-1401Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dysphagia often occurs during Parkinson's disease (PD) and can have severe consequences. Recently, neuromodulatory techniques have been used to treat neurogenic dysphagia. Here we aimed to compare the neurophysiological and swallowing effects of three different types of neurostimulation, 5 Hertz (Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), 1 Hz rTMS and pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) in patients with PD. Method: 12 PD patients with dysphagia were randomised to receive either 5 Hz rTMS, 1 Hz rTMS, or PES. In a cross-over design, patients were assigned to one intervention and received both real and sham stimulation. Patients received a baseline videofluoroscopic (VFS) assessment of their swallowing, enabling penetration aspiration scores (PAS) to be calculated for: thin fluids, paste, solids and cup drinking. Swallowing timing measurements were also performed on thin fluid swallows only. They then had baseline recordings of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from both pharyngeal and (as a control) abductor pollicis brevis (APB) cortical areas using single-pulse TMS. Subsequently, the intervention was administered and post interventional TMS recordings were taken at 0 and 30 minutes followed by a repeat VFS within 60 minutes of intervention. Results: All interventions were well tolerated. Due to lower than expected recruitment, statistical analysis of the data was not undertaken. However, with respect to PAS swallowing timings and MEP amplitudes, there was small but visible difference in the outcomes between active and sham. Conclusion: PES, 5 Hz rTMS and 1 Hz rTMS are tolerable interventions in PD related dysphagia. Due to small patient numbers no definitive conclusions could be drawn from the data with respect to individual interventions improving swallowing function and comparative effectiveness between interventions. Larger future studies are needed to further explore the efficacy of these neuromodulatory treatments in Parkinson's Disease associated dysphagia.

Indexed as

DysphagiaParkinson'sPESrTMSSwallowing

Identifiers

PMID35726231
PMCPMC7612876
OpenAlexW4226516426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.