Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726217›Full record

ArticleRehabilitation research and practice2022

Effect of Manual Wheelchair Type on Mobility Performance, Cardiorespiratory Responses, and Perceived Exertion.

Guilherme da Silva Bertolaccini, Frode Eika Sandnes, Fausto Orsi Medola, Terje Gjøvaag

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rehabilitation research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guilherme da Silva BertolacciniFaculty of Technology, Art and Design, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0315-0907
Frode Eika SandnesFaculty of Technology, Art and Design, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7781-748X
Fausto Orsi MedolaSchool of Architecture, Arts and Communication, State University of Sao Paulo (UNESP), Bauru, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2308-6524
Terje GjøvaagFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8886-5532
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is aimed at comparing the design and configuration of the most commonly used manual wheelchair models through cardiorespiratory responses, perceived exertion, and mobility performance using two different manual wheelchairs, during mobility tasks. A within-group 2 × 3 × 2 controlled experiment was designed with three independent and four dependent variables. The independent variables included wheelchairs, with the levels active wheelchair with a rigid frame and passive wheelchair with foldable frame; conditions with the levels straight line, slalom, and agility; and speed with levels comfortable and fast. Dependent variables included oxygen uptake (VO

Identifiers

PMID35726217
PMCPMC9206577
OpenAlexW4285745291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.