Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726103›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Deep learning to detect anterior cruciate ligament tear on knee MRI: multi-continental external validation.

Alexia Tran, Louis Lassalle, Pascal Zille, Raphaël Guillin, Etienne Pluot, Chloé Adam, Martin Charachon, Hugues Brat, Maxence Wallaert, Gaspard d'Assignies and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Recent Advances in Musculoskeletal Radiology: Bridging Innovation and Clinical Application.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Musculoskeletal Imaging.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. AI for Lesion Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiology.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexia TranDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris; Université de Paris, 20 Rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France. tranalexia@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3416-6749
Louis LassalleRéseau d'imagerie Sud Francilien, Evry, France.
Pascal ZilleIncepto Medical, Paris, France.
Raphaël GuillinDepartment of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Etienne PluotDepartment of Radiology, Radiologie B, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris; Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Chloé AdamIncepto Medical, Paris, France.
Martin CharachonIncepto Medical, Paris, France.
Hugues BratInstitut de Radiologie de Sion, Groupe 3R, Sion, Switzerland.
Maxence WallaertIncepto Medical, Paris, France.
Gaspard d'AssigniesIncepto Medical, Paris, France.
Benoît RizkInstitut de Radiologie de Sion, Groupe 3R, Sion, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a deep-learning algorithm for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear detection and to compare its accuracy using two external datasets.

methodsA database of 19,765 knee MRI scans (17,738 patients) issued from different manufacturers and magnetic fields was used to build a deep learning-based ACL tear detector. Fifteen percent showed partial or complete ACL rupture. Coronal and sagittal fat-suppressed proton density or T2-weighted sequences were used. A Natural Language Processing algorithm was used to automatically label reports associated with each MRI exam. We compared the accuracy of our model on two publicly available external datasets: MRNet, Bien et al, USA (PLoS Med 15:e1002699, 2018); and KneeMRI, Stajduhar et al, Croatia (Comput Methods Prog Biomed 140:151-164, 2017). Receptor operating characteristics (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were used to evaluate our model.

resultsOur neural networks achieved an AUC value of 0.939 for detection of ACL tears, with a sensitivity of 87% (0.875) and a specificity of 91% (0.908). After retraining our model on Bien dataset and Stajduhar dataset, our algorithm achieved AUC of 0.962 (95% CI 0.930-0.988) and 0.922 (95% CI 0.875, 0.962) respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were respectively 85% (95% CI 75-94%, 0.852), 89% (95% CI 82-97%, 0.894), 0.875 (95% CI 0.817-0.933) for Bien dataset, and 68% (95% CI 54-81%, 0.681), 93% (95% CI 89-97%, 0.934), and 0.870 (95% CI 0.821-0.913) for Stajduhar dataset.

conclusionOur algorithm showed high performance in the detection of ACL tears with AUC on two external datasets, demonstrating its generalizability on different manufacturers and populations. This study shows the performance of an algorithm for detecting anterior cruciate ligament tears with an external validation on populations from countries and continents different from the study population. KEY POINTS: • An algorithm for detecting anterior cruciate ligament ruptures was built from a large dataset of nearly 20,000 MRI with AUC values of 0.939, sensitivity of 87%, and specificity of 91%. • This algorithm was tested on two external populations from different other countries: a dataset from an American population and a dataset from a Croatian population. Performance remains high on these two external validation populations (AUC of 0.962 and 0.922 respectively).

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesDeep LearningAnterior Cruciate LigamentArthroscopyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceDeep learningKnee injuriesMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.