Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35726008›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Development and internal validation of a model to predict type 2 diabetic complications after gestational diabetes.

Ugochinyere Vivian Ukah, Robert W Platt, Nathalie Auger, Kaberi Dasgupta, Natalie Dayan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prediction Models for Maternal and Offspring Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Gestational Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Gestational Diabetes: An Update 60 Years After O'Sullivan and Mahan.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ugochinyere Vivian UkahDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Robert W PlattDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nathalie AugerDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kaberi DasguptaDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Natalie DayanDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. Vivian.Ukah@mail.mcgill.ca.
McGill University · CAInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) increases the risk of early-onset type 2 diabetes, which further exacerbates the risk of developing diabetic complications such as kidney, circulatory, and neurological complications. Yet, existing models have solely focused on the prediction of type 2 diabetes, and not of its complications, which are arguably the most clinically relevant outcomes. Our aim was to develop a prediction model for type 2 diabetic complications in patients with GDM. Using provincial administrative data from Quebec, Canada, we developed a model to predict type 2 diabetic complications within 10 years among 90,143 women with GDM. The model was internally validated and assessed for discrimination, calibration, and risk stratification accuracy. The incidence of diabetic complications was 3.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.4-4.3) per 10,000 person-years. The final prediction model included maternal age, socioeconomic deprivation, substance use disorder, gestational age at delivery, severe maternal morbidity, previous pregnancy complications, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. The model had good discrimination [area under the curve (AUROC) 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.74)] and calibration (slope ≥ 0.9) to predict diabetic complications. In the highest category of the risk stratification table, the positive likelihood ratio was 8.68 (95% CI 4.14-18.23), thereby showing a moderate ability to identify women at highest risk of developing type 2 diabetic complications. Our model predicts the risk of type 2 diabetic complications with moderate accuracy and, once externally validated, may prove to be a useful tool in the management of women after GDM.

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Pregnancy ComplicationsFemaleHumansMaternal AgePregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35726008
PMCPMC9209541
OpenAlexW4283166637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.