ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional U-Net architectures for segmentation of adipose tissue in cardiac magnetic resonance images.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A new insight on imaging characteristics of pericoronary adipose tissue for cardiovascular risk.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Review
- A Dual-Channel Deep Learning Approach for Lung Cavity Estimation From Hyperpolarized Gas and Proton MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The process of identifying cardiac adipose tissue (CAT) from volumetric magnetic resonance imaging of the heart is tedious, time-consuming, and often dependent on observer interpretation. Many 2-dimensional (2D) convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been implemented to automate the cardiac segmentation process, but none have attempted to identify CAT. Furthermore, the results from automatic segmentation of other cardiac structures leave room for improvement. This study investigated the viability of a 3-dimensional (3D) CNN in comparison to a similar 2D CNN. Both models used a U-Net architecture to simultaneously classify CAT, left myocardium, left ventricle, and right myocardium. The multi-phase model trained with multiple observers' segmentations reached a whole-volume Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.925 across all classes and 0.640 for CAT specifically; the corresponding 2D model's DSC across all classes was 0.902 and 0.590 for CAT specifically. This 3D model also achieved a higher level of CAT-specific DSC agreement with a group of observers with a Williams Index score of 0.973 in comparison to the 2D model's score of 0.822.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.