ArticleScientific reports2022
An interpretable machine learning approach to identify mechanism of action of antibiotics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large-scale discovery platform enables identification of peptides targeting drug-resistant candidiasis.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Interpreting the Black Box: Interpretable Machine Learning and Systems Pharmacology in Small-Molecule Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Novel Antimicrobials from Computational Modelling and Drug Repositioning: PotentialMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Using mathematical modelling and AI to improve delivery and efficacy of therapies in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- A machine learning method for predicting molecular antimicrobial activity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Tackling the Antimicrobial Resistance "Pandemic" with Machine Learning Tools: A Summary of Available Evidence.Microorganisms · 2024Review
- Unlocking the mechanism of action: a cost-effective flow cytometry approach for accelerating antimicrobial drug development.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in predicting pathogenic microorganisms' antimicrobial resistance: challenges, progress, and prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction: Challenges and Opportunities towards Practical Implementation.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Bio-activity prediction of drug candidate compounds targeting SARS-Cov-2 using machine learning approaches.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
As antibiotic resistance is becoming a major public health problem worldwide, one of the approaches for novel antibiotic discovery is re-purposing drugs available on the market for treating antibiotic resistant bacteria. The main economic advantage of this approach is that since these drugs have already passed all the safety tests, it vastly reduces the overall cost of clinical trials. Recently, several machine learning approaches have been developed for predicting promising antibiotics by training on bioactivity data collected on a set of small molecules. However, these methods report hundreds/thousands of bioactive molecules, and it remains unclear which of these molecules possess a novel mechanism of action. While the cost of high-throughput bioactivity testing has dropped dramatically in recent years, determining the mechanism of action of small molecules remains a costly and time-consuming step, and therefore computational methods for prioritizing molecules with novel mechanisms of action are needed. The existing approaches for predicting bioactivity of small molecules are based on uninterpretable machine learning, and therefore are not capable of determining known mechanism of action of small molecules and prioritizing novel mechanisms. We introduce InterPred, an interpretable technique for predicting bioactivity of small molecules and their mechanism of action. InterPred has the same accuracy as the state of the art in bioactivity prediction, and it enables assigning chemical moieties that are responsible for bioactivity. After analyzing bioactivity data of several thousand molecules against bacterial and fungal pathogens available from Community for Open Antimicrobial Drug Discovery and a US Food and Drug Association-approved drug library, InterPred identified five known links between moieties and mechanism of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.