Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35725893›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

An interpretable machine learning approach to identify mechanism of action of antibiotics.

Mihir Mongia, Mustafa Guler, Hosein Mohimani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mihir Mongia *Computational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
Mustafa Guler *Computational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA.
Hosein MohimaniComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA. hoseinm@andrew.cmu.edu.
Carnegie Mellon University · US

Funding

Integrated Interdisciplinary, inter-university PhD Program Computational Biology (T32)T32EB009403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, BAR-JOSEPH, ZIV · 2009 to 2023
$4.4M
Toward a Deeper Understanding of Allostery and Allotargeting by Computational ApproachesR01GM139297 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Ivet Bahar · 2021 to 2026
$2.8M
Discovering novel small molecule antibiotics from complex microbial communities by integrating computational mass spectrometry and metagenome miningDP2GM137413 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI MOHIMANI, HOSEIN · 2019 to 2019
$2.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009403NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM137413NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As antibiotic resistance is becoming a major public health problem worldwide, one of the approaches for novel antibiotic discovery is re-purposing drugs available on the market for treating antibiotic resistant bacteria. The main economic advantage of this approach is that since these drugs have already passed all the safety tests, it vastly reduces the overall cost of clinical trials. Recently, several machine learning approaches have been developed for predicting promising antibiotics by training on bioactivity data collected on a set of small molecules. However, these methods report hundreds/thousands of bioactive molecules, and it remains unclear which of these molecules possess a novel mechanism of action. While the cost of high-throughput bioactivity testing has dropped dramatically in recent years, determining the mechanism of action of small molecules remains a costly and time-consuming step, and therefore computational methods for prioritizing molecules with novel mechanisms of action are needed. The existing approaches for predicting bioactivity of small molecules are based on uninterpretable machine learning, and therefore are not capable of determining known mechanism of action of small molecules and prioritizing novel mechanisms. We introduce InterPred, an interpretable technique for predicting bioactivity of small molecules and their mechanism of action. InterPred has the same accuracy as the state of the art in bioactivity prediction, and it enables assigning chemical moieties that are responsible for bioactivity. After analyzing bioactivity data of several thousand molecules against bacterial and fungal pathogens available from Community for Open Antimicrobial Drug Discovery and a US Food and Drug Association-approved drug library, InterPred identified five known links between moieties and mechanism of action.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriaDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID35725893
PMCPMC9209520
OpenAlexW4283168270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.