Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35725886›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A ResNet attention model for classifying mosquitoes from wing-beating sounds.

Xutong Wei, Md Zakir Hossain, Khandaker Asif Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xutong WeiResearch School of Computing, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Md Zakir HossainResearch School of Computing, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. zakir.hossain@anu.edu.au.
Khandaker Asif AhmedCSIRO Land and Water, Black Mountain, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquitoes are vectors of numerous deadly diseases, and mosquito classification task is vital for their control programs. To ease manual labor and time-consuming classification tasks, numerous image-based machine-learning (ML) models have been developed to classify different mosquito species. Mosquito wing-beating sounds can serve as a unique classifier for mosquito classification tasks, which can be adopted easily in field applications. The current study aims to develop a deep neural network model to identify six mosquito species of three different genera, based on their wing-beating sounds. While existing models focused on raw audios, we developed a comprehensive pre-processing step to convert raw audios into more informative Mel-spectrograms, resulting in more robust and noise-free extracted features. Our model, namely 'Wing-beating Network' or 'WbNet', combines the state-of-art residual neural network (ResNet) model as a baseline, with self-attention mechanism and data-augmentation technique, and outperformed other existing models. The WbNet achieved the highest performance of 89.9% and 98.9% for WINGBEATS and ABUZZ data respectively. For species of Aedes and Culex genera, our model achieved 100% precision, recall and F1-scores, whereas, for Anopheles, the WbNet reached above 95%. We also compared two existing wing-beating datasets, namely WINGBEATS and ABUZZ, and found our model does not need sophisticated audio devices, hence performed better on ABUZZ audios, captured on usual mobile devices. Overall, our model has potential to serve in mosquito monitoring and prevalence studies in mosquito eradication programs, along with potential implementation in classification tasks of insect pests or other sound-based classifications.

Indexed as

AedesAnophelesCulexAnimalsMosquito VectorsNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35725886
PMCPMC9209486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.