ArticleScientific reports2022
A ResNet attention model for classifying mosquitoes from wing-beating sounds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attention-Driven CNNs as a Strong Default for HER2 Prediction from DCE-MRI: A Comparison with Transformer Architectures.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advancing insect monitoring: analysis of mel-frequency cepstral coefficients from optical signals for body orientation estimation.Applied physics. B, Lasers and optics · 2026Article
- Article
- How technologies are driving digital innovation in mosquito surveillance systems: a global scoping review over the past decade.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Automated age grading of female Culex pipiens by an optical sensor system coupled to a mosquito trap.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mosquitoes are vectors of numerous deadly diseases, and mosquito classification task is vital for their control programs. To ease manual labor and time-consuming classification tasks, numerous image-based machine-learning (ML) models have been developed to classify different mosquito species. Mosquito wing-beating sounds can serve as a unique classifier for mosquito classification tasks, which can be adopted easily in field applications. The current study aims to develop a deep neural network model to identify six mosquito species of three different genera, based on their wing-beating sounds. While existing models focused on raw audios, we developed a comprehensive pre-processing step to convert raw audios into more informative Mel-spectrograms, resulting in more robust and noise-free extracted features. Our model, namely 'Wing-beating Network' or 'WbNet', combines the state-of-art residual neural network (ResNet) model as a baseline, with self-attention mechanism and data-augmentation technique, and outperformed other existing models. The WbNet achieved the highest performance of 89.9% and 98.9% for WINGBEATS and ABUZZ data respectively. For species of Aedes and Culex genera, our model achieved 100% precision, recall and F1-scores, whereas, for Anopheles, the WbNet reached above 95%. We also compared two existing wing-beating datasets, namely WINGBEATS and ABUZZ, and found our model does not need sophisticated audio devices, hence performed better on ABUZZ audios, captured on usual mobile devices. Overall, our model has potential to serve in mosquito monitoring and prevalence studies in mosquito eradication programs, along with potential implementation in classification tasks of insect pests or other sound-based classifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.