Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35725851›Full record

Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2022

A comparison of hernia sac ligation versus invagination in Lichtenstein tension-free mesh hernioplasty: does the type of hernia play a role in outcomes?

A Burak Ciftci, S Ocak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05308251 (Comparison of Hernia Sac Ligation Versus Invagination in Lichtenstein Tension Free Mesh Hernioplasty. Does Type of Hernia Have a Role on Outcomes?), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05308251 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Hernia Sac Ligation Versus Invagination in Lichtenstein Tension Free Mesh Hernioplasty. Does Type of Hernia Have a Role on Outcomes?

TypeinterventionalSponsorSamsun Education and Research HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled108ConditionsHernia, Inguinal, Postoperative Pain, RecurrenceArmsLichtenstein Mesh Hernioplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Burak CiftciDepartment of General Surgery, Samsun University, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Barış Bulvarı, Kadıköy Mahallesi, No:199 PK:55090, İlkadım, Samsun, Turkey. aburak.ciftci@samsun.edu.tr.
S OcakDepartment of General Surgery, Samsun University, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Barış Bulvarı, Kadıköy Mahallesi, No:199 PK:55090, İlkadım, Samsun, Turkey.
Samsun University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of the indirect hernial sac in inguinal hernia repairs has long been a subject of debate among general surgeons. Although hernial sac high ligation (HL) is a time-honored concept in groin hernia surgery, non-ligation/invagination is gaining popularity. This study was intended to compare the effects of hernia sac ligation and invagination in patients undergoing Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty (LMH). Another aim was to investigate the possible association between the hernial defect size and postoperative early pain in both groups.

methodsPatients with indirect inguinal hernia undergoing elective LMH under spinal anesthesia were included in this prospective randomized study. Patients were classified according to European Hernia Society (EHS) criteria and were randomized into two groups, HL and non-HL/invagination. Postoperative pain levels at 6, 12, and 24 h, 7 days, and 1 year were compared using a ten-point visual analog scale (VAS). In addition, recurrence was examined in the postoperative first year. Postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, drain use, and surgery times were evaluated as secondary outcomes. This study was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . (The clinicaltrials.gov ID number is: NCT05308251).

resultsNinety-three out of a total of 108 patients were included in the study between January 2020 and January 2021 (HL group n = 44, non-HL group n = 49). Demographic characteristics were comparable between the groups. Mean VAS scores were significantly higher in the HL group at 6 and 12 h postoperatively (p < 0.05 and p = 0.036 respectively). While there was no difference in pain levels between the groups in EHS 1 and EHS 2 hernias (p > 0.05 for all), VAS scores were significantly higher in the ligation group in EHS 3 hernias (p < 0.05 for all). Recurrence and complication rates were unaffected with non-ligation at a median 18 months follow-up.

conclusionHernia sac invagination was superior to ligation in patients who underwent LMH, as it reduced early postoperative pain levels without disturbing repair integrity. We therefore recommend that ligating the hernial sac be avoided, especially in EHS 3 patients who undergo LMH.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansPostoperative PainProspective StudiesRecurrenceSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeIndirect hernia sacInvaginationLichtensteinLigation

Identifiers

PMID35725851
OpenAlexW4283163572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.