Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35725760›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Diagnostic advantage of thin slice 2D MRI and multiplanar reconstruction of the knee joint using deep learning based denoising approach.

Takahide Kakigi, Ryo Sakamoto, Hiroshi Tagawa, Shinichi Kuriyama, Yoshihito Goto, Masahito Nambu, Hajime Sagawa, Hitomi Numamoto, Kanae Kawai Miyake, Tsuneo Saga and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Thin-slice 2D MR Imaging of the Shoulder Joint Using Denoising Deep Learning Reconstruction Provides Higher Image Quality Than 3D MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Takahide KakigiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. tkakigi@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Ryo SakamotoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Hiroshi TagawaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Shinichi KuriyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yoshihito GotoDepartment of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Masahito NambuMRI Systems Division, Canon Medical Systems Corporation, 1385 Shimoishigami, Otawara, Tochigi, 324-8550, Japan.
Hajime SagawaDivision of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Hitomi NumamotoDepartment of Advanced Medical Imaging Research, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Kanae Kawai MiyakeDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Tsuneo SagaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Shuichi MatsudaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Yuji NakamotoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether thin-slice high-resolution 2D fat-suppressed proton density-weighted image of the knee joint using denoising approach with deep learning-based reconstruction (dDLR) with MPR is more useful than 3D FS-PD multi planar voxel image. Twelve patients who underwent MRI of the knee at 3T and 13 knees were enrolled. Denoising effect was quantitatively evaluated by comparing the coefficient of variation (CV) before and after dDLR. For the qualitative assessment, two radiologists evaluated image quality, artifacts, anatomical structures, and abnormal findings using a 5-point Likert scale between 2D and 3D. All of them were statistically analyzed. Gwet's agreement coefficients were also calculated. For the scores of abnormal findings, we calculated the percentages of the cases with agreement with high confidence. The CV after dDLR was significantly lower than the one before dDLR (p < 0.05). As for image quality, artifacts and anatomical structure, no significant differences were found except for flow artifact (p < 0.05). The agreement was significantly higher in 2D than in 3D in abnormal findings (p < 0.05). In abnormal findings, the percentage with high confidence was higher in 2D than in 3D (p < 0.05). By applying dDLR to 2D, almost equivalent image quality to 3D could be obtained. Furthermore, abnormal findings could be depicted with greater confidence and consistency, indicating that 2D with dDLR can be a promising imaging method for the knee joint disease evaluation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalKnee JointMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID35725760
PMCPMC9209466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.