ArticleNature communications2022
Annual cycle observations of aerosols capable of ice formation in central Arctic clouds.
Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical and physical equilibria shape dual ice-nucleation pathways in an organic crystal.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- Sources and Composition of Organic Aerosols in the Central Arctic during Spring and Summer.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Marine phytoplankton and sea-ice initiated convection drive spatiotemporal differences in Arctic summertime mercury rebound.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Impact of Siberian Wildfires on Ice-Nucleating Particle Concentrations over the Northwestern Pacific.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Decreased dust particles amplify the cloud cooling effect by regulating cloud ice formation over the Tibetan Plateau.Science advances · 2024Article
- Overview of the Alaskan Layered Pollution and Chemical Analysis (ALPACA) Field Experiment.ACS ES&T air · 2024Article
- Regionally sourced bioaerosols drive high-temperature ice nucleating particles in the Arctic.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Bioaerosols are the dominant source of warm-temperature immersion-mode INPs and drive uncertainties in INP predictability.Science advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Arctic is warming faster than anywhere else on Earth, prompting glacial melt, permafrost thaw, and sea ice decline. These severe consequences induce feedbacks that contribute to amplified warming, affecting weather and climate globally. Aerosols and clouds play a critical role in regulating radiation reaching the Arctic surface. However, the magnitude of their effects is not adequately quantified, especially in the central Arctic where they impact the energy balance over the sea ice. Specifically, aerosols called ice nucleating particles (INPs) remain understudied yet are necessary for cloud ice production and subsequent changes in cloud lifetime, radiative effects, and precipitation. Here, we report observations of INPs in the central Arctic over a full year, spanning the entire sea ice growth and decline cycle. Further, these observations are size-resolved, affording valuable information on INP sources. Our results reveal a strong seasonality of INPs, with lower concentrations in the winter and spring controlled by transport from lower latitudes, to enhanced concentrations of INPs during the summer melt, likely from marine biological production in local open waters. This comprehensive characterization of INPs will ultimately help inform cloud parameterizations in models of all scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.