Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35725632›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

The influence of skin-to-skin contact on Cortical Activity during Painful procedures in preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (iCAP mini): study protocol for a randomized control trial.

Marsha Campbell-Yeo, Britney Benoit, Aaron Newman, Celeste Johnston, Tim Bardouille, Bonnie Stevens, Arlene Jiang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03745963 (iCAP Mini - The Influence of Skin-to-skin Contact on Cortical Activity During Painful Procedures on Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03745963 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

iCAP Mini - The Influence of Skin-to-skin Contact on Cortical Activity During Painful Procedures on Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIWK Health CentreRan2018 to 2021Enrolled126ConditionsPain, Acute, Infant, Newborn, ElectroencephalographyArmsSkin-to-skin contact, 24% oral sucrose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Neonatal Pain Management: Is There An Endocrinal Response?Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marsha Campbell-YeoSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University and IWK Health, Halifax, NS, Canada. Marsha.campbell-yeo@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-2809
Britney BenoitRankin School of Nursing, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada.
Aaron NewmanFaculty of Science, Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Celeste JohnstonMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Tim BardouilleDepartment of Physics & Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Bonnie StevensLawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto and Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arlene JiangDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAMcGill University · CASt. Francis Xavier University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStrong evidence suggests that maternal-infant skin-to-skin contact (SSC) is effective in reducing behavioural responses to pain. Given the multi-sensory benefits of SSC, it is highly likely that SSC provided during pain in early life may reduce pain-induced brain activity. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of SSC compared to 24% sucrose on pain-induced activity in the preterm infant brain during a medically required heel lance. Secondary objectives include determining (a) differences between behavioural pain response and noxious-related brain activity during heel lance and (b) rate of adverse events across groups.

methodsWe will randomly assign 126 babies (32 to 36 completed weeks gestational age) admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, and their mothers within the first seven days of age to receive (i) SSC plus sterile water and (ii) 24% oral sucrose. Each baby will receive a medically indicated heel lance, following a no treatment baseline period. The primary outcome is noxious-related brain activity measured using an electroencephalogram (EEG) pain-specific event-related potential. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity measured using a bio-behavioural infant pain assessment tool (Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised) and rate of adverse events. DISCUSSION: This will be the first clinical trial to compare the effect of SSC and 24% sucrose on pain-induced brain activity in the preterm infant brain during a clinical noxious stimulus, measured using EEG. Given the negative neurodevelopmental outcomes associated with unmanaged pain, it is imperative that preterm babies receive the most effective pain-reducing treatments to improve their health outcomes. Our findings will have important implications in informing optimal pain assessment and management in preterm infants.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03745963 . Registered on November 19, 2018.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPainPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSucroseSucroseAcuteBio-behavioural assessmentCorticalEEG-evoked potentialsInfant/neonatePainPrematurityRCTSkin-to-skin contactSweet taste

Identifiers

PMID35725632
PMCPMC9208173
OpenAlexW4283169549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.