Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35725623›Full record

ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022

Twenty years of the Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS): insights, achievements, and lessons learned from a global patient registry.

Michael Beck, Uma Ramaswami, Elizabeth Hernberg-Ståhl, Derralynn A Hughes, Christoph Kampmann, Atul B Mehta, Kathleen Nicholls, Dau-Ming Niu, Guillem Pintos-Morell, Ricardo Reisin and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03289065 (Fabry Outcome Survey), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03289065 completednot on this map

Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS)

TypeobservationalSponsorShireRan2001 to 2021Enrolled4,000ConditionsFabry Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Aseptic meningitis and Fabry disease.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The kidney in genetic metabolic disorders.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 10 countries.

Michael BeckSphinCS GmbH, Institute Clinical Science LSD, Hochheim, Germany.
Uma RamaswamiLysosomal Disorders Unit, Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK. uma.ramaswami@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-4703-7447
Elizabeth Hernberg-StåhlLate Phase Solutions Europe AB, Täby, Sweden.
Derralynn A HughesLysosomal Disorders Unit, Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, London, UK.
Christoph KampmannJohannes Gutenberg School of Medicine, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Atul B MehtaDepartment of Haematology, University College London, London, UK.
Kathleen NichollsThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Dau-Ming NiuTaipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Guillem Pintos-MorellReference Centre for Hereditary Metabolic Disorders (MetabERN), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Ricardo ReisinHospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Michael L WestDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jörn SchenkTakeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christina AnagnostopoulouTakeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jaco BothaTakeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Roberto GiuglianiDepartment of Genetics, UFRGS, Medical Genetics Service, HCPA, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Takeda (Switzerland) · CHRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBDalhousie University · CAHebron University · PSHospital Británico de Buenos Aires · ARJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DETaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient registries provide long-term, real-world evidence that aids the understanding of the natural history and progression of disease, and the effects of treatment on large patient populations with rare diseases. The year 2021 marks the 20th anniversary of the Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS), an international, multicenter, observational registry (NCT03289065). The primary aims of FOS are to broaden the understanding of Fabry disease (FD), an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, and to improve the clinical management of affected patients. Here, we review the history of FOS and the analyses and publications disseminated from the registry, and we discuss the contributions FOS studies have made in understanding FD.

resultsFOS was initiated in April 2001 and, as of January 2021, 4484 patients with a confirmed diagnosis and patient informed consent have been enrolled from 144 centers across 26 countries. Data from FOS have been published in nearly 60 manuscripts on a wide variety of topics relevant to FD. Analyses of FOS data have investigated the long-term effectiveness and safety of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with agalsidase alfa and its effects on morbidity and mortality, as well as the benefits of prompt and early treatment with agalsidase alfa on the progression of cardiomyopathy and the decline in renal function associated with FD. Based on analyses of FOS data, ERT with agalsidase alfa has also been shown to improve additional signs and symptoms of FD experienced by patients. FOS data analyses have provided a better understanding of the natural history of FD and the specific populations of women, children, and the elderly, and have provided practical tools for the study of FD. FOS has also provided methodology and criteria for assessing disease severity which contributed to the continuous development of medical practice in FD and has largely improved our understanding of the challenges and needs of long-term data collection in rare diseases, aiding in future rare disease real-world evidence studies.

conclusionFOS over the last 20 years has substantially increased the scientific knowledge around improved patient management of FD and continues to expand our understanding of this rare disease.

Indexed as

Fabry DiseaseRare DiseasesAgedalpha-GalactosidaseChildEnzyme Replacement TherapyFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRecombinant ProteinsRegistriesTreatment Outcomealpha-GalactosidaseRecombinant ProteinsAgalsidase alfaCardiovascular outcomesEnzyme replacement therapyFabry diseaseRenal outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35725623
PMCPMC9208147
OpenAlexW4283166156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.