Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35725563›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

HarmonizR enables data harmonization across independent proteomic datasets with appropriate handling of missing values.

Hannah Voß, Simon Schlumbohm, Philip Barwikowski, Marcus Wurlitzer, Matthias Dottermusch, Philipp Neumann, Hartmut Schlüter, Julia E Neumann, Christoph Krisp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Best practices for using biological data in psychological research.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hannah Voß *Section Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Simon Schlumbohm *High Performance Computing, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany.
Philip BarwikowskiSection Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Marcus WurlitzerBusiness division for Information Technology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Matthias DottermuschResearch Group Molecular Pathology in Neurooncology, Center for Molecular Neurobiology (ZMNH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9769-7080
Philipp NeumannHigh Performance Computing, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8604-8846
Hartmut SchlüterSection Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9358-7036
Julia E NeumannResearch Group Molecular Pathology in Neurooncology, Center for Molecular Neurobiology (ZMNH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. ju.neumann@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1162-8771
Christoph KrispSection Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany. christoph.krisp.uke@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4689-1967

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dataset integration is common practice to overcome limitations in statistically underpowered omics datasets. Proteome datasets display high technical variability and frequent missing values. Sophisticated strategies for batch effect reduction are lacking or rely on error-prone data imputation. Here we introduce HarmonizR, a data harmonization tool with appropriate missing value handling. The method exploits the structure of available data and matrix dissection for minimal data loss, without data imputation. This strategy implements two common batch effect reduction methods-ComBat and limma (removeBatchEffect()). The HarmonizR strategy, evaluated on four exemplarily analyzed datasets with up to 23 batches, demonstrated successful data harmonization for different tissue preservation techniques, LC-MS/MS instrumentation setups, and quantification approaches. Compared to data imputation methods, HarmonizR was more efficient and performed superior regarding the detection of significant proteins. HarmonizR is an efficient tool for missing data tolerant experimental variance reduction and is easily adjustable for individual dataset properties and user preferences.

Indexed as

ProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryAlgorithmsChromatography, LiquidProteomeResearch DesignProteome

Identifiers

PMID35725563
PMCPMC9209422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.