ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous cement discoplasty by finite element analysis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tissue-Level Neck Response in Rotary-Wing Aircrew With Head-Supported Mass Assessed With Finite Element Model.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Efficacy of percutaneous cement discoplasty combined with PVP for the treatment of stage III Kümmell disease with an adjacent disc vacuum sign.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Motion attenuation surgery in the degenerative lumbar spine: Is cement discoplasty a safe and effective option?Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous cement discoplasty combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Behavior of Injected Cement Spacers versus Traditional Cages in Low-Density Lumbar Spine under Compression Loading.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Biomechanical consequences of cement discoplasty: AnFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous cement discoplasty (PCD) is a minimally invasive treatment for degenerative lumbar spine disease, but the relationship between decompression effect on the nerve root and different doses of bone cement is uncertain. PURPOSE: To investigate the indirect decompression effect of cement with different doses on nerve roots and the biomechanical changes on the spine during PCD using finite element analysis (FEA).
methodsFEA was adapted to analyze the mechanical changes in the lumbar vertebrae before and after the application of PCD.CT scan images of adult males were utilized to establish a finite element model of the lumbar vertebral body using mimics and Pro/E software. The images were divided into four models: the normal model (normal, model N), the disc degeneration model (high, model H), the intervertebral disc injected with 3 mL of bone cement (model H1), and the intervertebral disc injected with 5 mL of bone cement (model H2). All models were analyzed using the ABAQUS6.14.2 software. The normal physiological movements were simulated, and the mechanical changes in the lumbar vertebrae were observed prior to and after the cement filling application.
resultsThe stress of the nerve root in model H was the largest. The nerve root stress in the model H2 was the smallest during flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation, and right rotation at 90%, 44%, 25%, 56%, 56%, and 51% of the normal benchmark, respectively. After the injection of bone cement, the nerve root stress is reduced. The greater the amount of cement, the lesser the nerve root stress. The motion was reduced in models H, H1, and H2, and there were differences between models H1 and H2. Cartilage endplate stress was less in model H2 than in model H1.
conclusionsThe nerve root stress increased after degeneration and decreased after intervertebral height recovery through cement injection, resulting in a significant indirect decompression effect.The stress of the nerve root decreased with the increase in the amount of cement injection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.