ArticleBMC genomic data2022
Analysis of codon usage bias of WRKY transcription factors in Helianthus annuus.
Article in BMC genomic data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Wide Characterization of bZIP Transcription Factors and Their Drought-Responsive Expression inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- High-resolution comparative genomics and compositional analysis of WRKY transcription factors across seven cereal and model plant genomes.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Codon usage patterns and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes reveal evolutionary insights into Asphodelaceae species.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evolution and Functional Implications of Codon Usage Bias in Eukaryotes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Review
- Analysis and comparison of chloroplast genome codon usage patterns in five accessions of Toxicodendron vernicifluum.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Meltome Atlas of Arabidopsis thaliana proteome: a melting temperature-based identification of heat and cold resistant proteins using in-silico approach.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pachystachys lutea Nees: genome structure, adaptive evolution, and phylogenetic relationships.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
- Codon Usage Bias of the Polyphenol Oxidase Genes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Characterisation of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Genome-wide characterization of the cytochrome P450 gene family in Solanum melongena and functional analysis of SmCYP82C1 under cold stress.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive genome-wide analysis of bHLH family genes in Nymphaea colorata and molecular characterization of NcTT8.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of WRKY transcription factors under abiotic stresses in Carthamus tinctorius L.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Evolutionary dynamics of the calcium/cation antiporter superfamily in Brassicaceae: codon usage, selection pressure, andFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the codon usage patterns in the polyprotein coding sequences of the honeybee viruses.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Codon usage bias analysis of theFrontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Selection on synonymous codon usage in soybean (Glycine max) WRKY genes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Phylogenomics and plastome evolution of Lithospermeae (Boraginaceae).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Codon Bias of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Comparative analysis of codon usage bias in the chloroplast genomes of eighteen Ampelopsideae species (Vitaceae).BMC genomic data · 2024Article
- Plastome evolution of Engelhardia facilitates phylogeny of Juglandaceae.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe phenomenon of codon usage bias is known to exist in many genomes and is mainly determined by mutation and selection. Codon usage bias analysis is a suitable strategy for identifying the principal evolutionary driving forces in different organisms. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is an annual crop that is cultivated worldwide as ornamentals, food plants and for their valuable oil. The WRKY family genes in plants play a central role in diverse regulation and multiple stress responses. Evolutionary analysis of WRKY family genes of H. annuus can provide rich genetic information for developing hybridization resources of the genus Helianthus.
resultsBases composition analysis showed the average GC content of WRKY genes of H. annuus was 43.42%, and the average GC3 content was 39.60%, suggesting that WRKY gene family prefers A/T(U) ending codons. There were 29 codons with relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) greater than 1 and 22 codons ending with A and U base. The effective number of codons (ENC) and codon adaptation index (CAI) in WRKY genes ranged from 43.47-61.00 and 0.14-0.26, suggesting that the codon bias was weak and WRKY genes expression level was low. Neutrality analysis found a significant correlation between GC12 and GC3. ENC-plot showed most genes on or close to the expected curve, suggesting that mutational bias played a major role in shaping codon usage. The Parity Rule 2 plot (PR2) analysis showed that the usage of AT and GC was disproportionate. A total of three codons were identified as the optimal codons.
conclusionApart from natural selection effects, most of the genetic evolution in the H. annuus WRKY genome might be driven by mutation pressure. Our results provide a theoretical foundation for elaborating the genetic architecture and mechanisms of H. annuus and contributing to enrich H. annuus genetic resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.