Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35725263›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Development and validation of a multidimensional, culturally and socially inclusive Child Resilience Questionnaire (parent/caregiver report) to measure factors that support resilience: a community-based participatory research and psychometric testing study in Australia.

Deirdre Gartland, Elisha Riggs, Rebecca Giallo, Karen Glover, Mardi Stowe, Sharon Mongta, Donna Weetra, Stephanie Janne Brown, Members of the Childhood Resilience Study Collaborative Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Deirdre GartlandIntergenerational Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia deirdre.gartland@mcri.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6749-8147
Elisha RiggsIntergenerational Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0799-7467
Rebecca GialloIntergenerational Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Karen GloverIntergenerational Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mardi StoweVictorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharon MongtaFamily Violence, Djirra, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Donna WeetraWomen and Families, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Stephanie Janne BrownIntergenerational Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9812-0067
Members of the Childhood Resilience Study Collaborative Group
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUMyer Foundation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDevelop a comprehensive socially inclusive measure to assess child resilience factors.

designA socioecological model of resilience, community-based participatory research methods and two rounds of psychometric testing created the Child Resilience Questionnaire (parent/caregiver report, child report, school report). The parent/caregiver report (CRQ-P/C) is the focus of this paper.

settingAustralia.

participantsCulturally and socially diverse parents/caregivers of children aged 5-12 years completed the CRQ-P/C in the pilot (n=489) and validation study (n=1114). Recruitment via a large tertiary hospital's outpatient clinics, Aboriginal and refugee background communities (Aboriginal and bicultural researchers networks) and nested follow-up of mothers in a pregnancy cohort and a cohort of Aboriginal families. ANALYSIS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses conducted to assess the structure and construct validity of CRQ-P/C subscales. Cronbach's alpha used to assess internal consistency of subscales. Criterion validity assessed with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) parent report.

resultsConceptually developed CRQ comprised 169 items in 19 subscales across five socioecological domains (self, family, friends, school and community). Two rounds of psychometric revision and community consultations created a CRQ-P/C with 43 items in 11 scales: self (positive self, positive future, managing emotions), family (connectedness, guidance, basic needs), school (teacher support, engagement, friends) and culture (connectedness, language). Excellent scale reliability (α=0.7-0.9), except

conclusionThe CRQ-P/C is a new multidomain measure of factors supporting resilience in children. It has good psychometric properties and will have broad applications in clinical, educational and research settings. The tool also adds to the few culturally competent measures relevant to Aboriginal and refugee background communities.

Indexed as

CaregiversCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchAustraliaChildHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity child healthPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID35725263
PMCPMC9214413
OpenAlexW4283167264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.