Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35725262›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Healthcare utilization and related costs among older people seeking primary care due to back pain: findings from the BACE-N cohort study.

Rikke Munk Killingmo, Kjersti Storheim, Danielle van der Windt, Zinajda Zolic-Karlsson, Ørjan Nesse Vigdal, Lise Kretz, Milada Cvancarova Småstuen, Margreth Grotle

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04261309 (BACk Pain in Elders in Norway), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04261309 completednot on this map

BACk Pain in Elders in Norway (BACE-N); A Prospective Cohort Study of Older People Visiting Primary Care With a New Episode of Back Pain

TypeobservationalSponsorOslo Metropolitan UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled452ConditionsBack PainArmsUsual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Economic Evaluation in Physiotherapy or How to Get the Best Value for Money.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Rikke Munk KillingmoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway rikke@oslomet.no.ORCID 0000-0003-1971-2449
Kjersti StorheimDepartment of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Danielle van der WindtSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-6703
Zinajda Zolic-KarlssonHTA and Reimbursement, Norwegian Medicines Agency, Oslo, Norway.
Ørjan Nesse VigdalDepartment of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5075-7720
Lise KretzDepartment of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Milada Cvancarova SmåstuenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Margreth GrotleDepartment of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8243-1143
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOOslo University Hospital · NODirektoratet for medisinske produkter · NOKeele University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe healthcare utilization and estimate associated costs during 1 year of follow-up among older people seeking primary care due to a new episode back pain and to describe healthcare utilization across patients with different risk profiles stratified using the StarT Back Screening Tool (SBST).

designProspective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingA total of 452 people aged ≥55 years seeking Norwegian primary care with a new episode of back pain were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome of this study was total cost of healthcare utilization aggregated for 1 year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included components of healthcare utilization aggregated for 1 year of follow-up. Healthcare utilization was self-reported and included: primary care consultations, medications, examinations, hospitalisation, rehabilitation stay, and operations. Costs were estimated based on unit costs collected from national pricelists. Healthcare utilization across patients with different SBST risk profiles was compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests and Bonferroni adjustment.

resultsIn total, 438 patients were included in the analysis. Mean (BCa 95% CI) total cost per patient over 1 year was €825 (682-976). Median (BCa 95% CI) total cost was €364 (307-440). The largest cost category was primary care consultations, accounting for 56% of total costs. Imaging rate was 34%. The most commonly used medication was paracetamol (27%-35% of patients). Medium- and high-risk patients had a significantly higher degree of healthcare utilization compared with low-risk patients (p<0.030).

conclusionThis study estimated a 1 year mean and median cost of healthcare utilization of €825 and €364, respectively. Patients within the top 25th percentile accounted for 77% of all costs. Patients classified as medium risk and high risk had a significantly higher degree of healthcare utilization compared with patients classified as low risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04261309, results.

Indexed as

Low Back PainAgedBack PainCohort StudiesHealth Care CostsHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareProspective Studiesback painepidemiologyhealth economics

Identifiers

PMID35725262
PMCPMC9214384
OpenAlexW4283164225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.