ReviewFertility and sterility2022
Modern assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes in the era of high-efficacy assisted reproductive technology.
Review in Fertility and sterility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful early term pregnancy in a patient with an unresected partial septate uterus: A case report.Case reports in women's health · 2026Article
- Organ-on-a-Chip Models of the Female Reproductive System: Current Progress and Future Perspectives.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Integrating salpingoscopy and immunohistochemistry to improve tubal infertility diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- A Large Study About Reproductive Factors That Predict Hysterosalpingography-Identified Tubal Pathology: An Insight into the Necessity of Preconception Screening.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Role of Hysteroscopy in the Assessment of Fallopian Tubal Patency: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2024Article
- Spontaneous Pregnancy after 4D-Hysterosalpingo-Sonography (HyCoSy) in the Same Menstrual Cycle: A Case Report and an Updating Review of the Current Literature regarding the Positive Impact of Tubal Flushing Effect on Fertility.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence diagnosis of intrauterine adhesion by 3D ultrasound imaging: a prospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The high efficacy of modern assisted reproductive technology (ART) and increase in the number of noninfertile patients who are using ART for family building in the United States call into question the relevance of the standard, one-size-fits-all infertility evaluation. Here, we explore whether all patients presenting for ART need uterine cavity and tubal assessment and what tests are most appropriate, efficient, and cost-effective in current times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.