ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2022
Predictors of Covid-19 Vaccination Response After In-Vivo T-Cell-Depleted Stem Cell Transplantation.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunologic responses to the third and fourth doses of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in cell therapy recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Virology journal · 2024Pooled it
- Humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation patients resemble that of healthy individuals.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- COVID-19 Vaccine Response in Allo-HSCT Recipients: Insights from a Real-World Prospective Cohort Study.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Impact of memory T cells on SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in hematopoietic stem cell transplant.PloS one · 2025Article
- Navigating uncharted waters: assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: challenges and innovations.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Vaccine schedule recommendations and updates for patients with hematologic malignancy post-hematopoietic cell transplant or CAR T-cell therapy.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2023Review
- Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-Induced Immune Responses Among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the COVID-19 era.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- COVID-19 and HSCT (Hematopoietic stem cell transplant).Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Covid-19 vaccination is recommended in allogeneic transplant recipients, but many questions remain regarding its efficacy. Here we studied serologic responses in 145 patients who had undergone allogeneic transplantation using in vivo T-cell depletion. Median age was 57 (range 21-79) at transplantation and 61 (range 24-80) at vaccination. Sixty-nine percent were Caucasian. One third each received transplants from HLA-identical related (MRD), adult unrelated (MUD), or haploidentical-cord blood donors. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis involved in-vivo T-cell depletion using alemtuzumab for MRD or MUD transplants and anti-thymocyte globulin for haplo-cord transplants. Patients were vaccinated between January 2021 and January 2022, an average of 31 months (range 3-111 months) after transplantation. Sixty-one percent received the BNT162b2 (bioNtech/Pfizer) vaccine, 34% received mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and 5% received JNJ-78436735 (Johnson & Johnson). After the initial vaccinations (2 doses for BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273, 1 dose for JNJ-7843673), 124 of the 145 (85%) patients had a detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) antibody, and 21 (15%) did not respond. Ninety-nine (68%) had high-level responses (≥100 binding antibody units [BAU]/mL)m and 25 (17%) had a low-level response (<100 BAU/mL). In multivariable analysis, lymphocyte count less than 1 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.