Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35724560›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2022

Short-term outcome for high-risk patients after esophagectomy.

Victor D Plat, Wessel T Stam, Boukje T Bootsma, Jennifer Straatman, Thomas Klausch, David J Heineman, Donald L van der Peet, Freek Daams, Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Are age, comorbidity, and frailty associated with complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy? A multicenter cohort study.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor D PlatDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4605-4058
Wessel T StamDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Boukje T BootsmaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jennifer StraatmanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas KlauschDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David J HeinemanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Donald L van der PeetDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Freek DaamsDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit Group
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) for esophageal cancer facilitates mediastinal dissection; however, it has a significant impact on cardiopulmonary status. High-risk patients may therefore be better candidates for transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) in order to prevent serious complications. This study addressed short-term outcome following TTE and THE in patients that are considered to have a higher risk of surgery-related morbidity. This population-based study included patients who underwent a curative esophagectomy between 2011 and 2018, registered in the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit. The Charlson comorbidity index was used to assign patients to a low-risk (score ≤ 1) and high-risk group (score ≥ 2). Propensity score matching was applied to produce comparable groups between high-risk patients receiving TTE and THE. Primary endpoint was mortality (in-hospital/30-day mortality), secondary endpoints included morbidity and oncological outcomes. Additionally, a matched subgroup analysis was performed, including only cervical reconstructions. Of 5,438 patients, 945 and 431 high-risk patients underwent TTE and THE, respectively. After propensity score matching, mortality (6.3 vs 3.3%, P = 0.050), overall morbidity, Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications, pulmonary complications, cardiac complications and re-interventions were significantly more observed after TTE compared to THE. A significantly higher mortality after TTE with a cervical reconstruction was found compared to THE (7.0 vs. 2.2%, P = 0.020). Patients with a high Charlson comorbidity index predispose for a complicated postoperative course after esophagectomy, this was more outspoken after TTE compared to THE. In daily practice, these outcomes should be balanced with the lower lymph node yield, but comparable positive node count and radicality after THE.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyHospital MortalityHumansLymph NodesPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCharlson comorbidity indexmortalitypopulation-basedpropensity score matchingtranshiatal esophagectomytransthoracic esophagectomy

Identifiers

PMID35724560
PMCPMC9817823
OpenAlexW4283219608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.