Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35724360›Full record

SynthesisJournal of athletic training2023

Evidence for Intrinsic Foot Muscle Training in Improving Foot Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abbis H Jaffri, Rachel Koldenhoven, Susan Saliba, Jay Hertel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of athletic training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06106958 (The Effects of Foot Rehabilitation And Minimalist Shoes), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06106958 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Foot Rehabilitation And Minimalist Shoes (FRAMES) on Pain, Strength, and Function in Adults With Plantar Fasciopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled37ConditionsPlantar Fascitis, Plantar Fasciopathy, Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet, Plantar Fasciitis of Right FootArmsHome Exercise Program, Minimalist Shoes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abbis H JaffriDepartment of Physical Therapy, Creighton University, Omaha, NE.
Rachel KoldenhovenDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University, San Marcos.
Susan SalibaDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Jay HertelDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
University of Virginia · USCreighton University · USTexas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo critically assess the literature focused on strength training of the intrinsic foot muscles (IFMs) and resulting improvements in foot function. DATA SOURCES: A search of electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus) was completed between January 2000 and March 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized control trials with an outcome of interest and at least 2 weeks of IFM exercise intervention were included. Outcomes of interest were broadly divided into 5 categories of foot posture (navicular drop and Foot Posture Index), namely: balance, strength, patient-reported outcomes, sensory function, and motor performance. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodologic quality of the included studies with 2 independent reviewers rating each study. Studies with a PEDro score greater than 4/10 were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extracted by 2 independent reviewers were design, participant characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, type of intervention, outcomes, and primary results. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis to analyze the difference between intervention and control groups for each outcome when at least 2 studies were available. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) describe effect sizes with 95% CIs (SMD ranges). When the CI crossed zero, the effect was not significant. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirteen studies were included, and IFM exercise interventions were associated with decreasing navicular drop (SMD range = 0.37, 1.83) and Foot Posture Index (SMD range = 1.03, 1.69) and improving balance (SMD range = 0.18, 1.86), strength (SMD range = 0.06, 1.52), and patient-reported outcomes for disability (SMD range = 0.12, 1.00), with pooled effect sizes favoring the IFM intervention over the control. The IFM exercises were not superior (SMD range = -0.15, 0.66) for reducing pain. We could not perform a meta-analysis for sensory function and motor performance, as only 1 study was available for each outcome; however, these results supported the use of IFM strength training.

conclusionsStrength training of the IFMs was helpful for patients in improving foot and ankle outcomes.

Indexed as

ExerciseResistance TrainingExercise TherapyHumansLower ExtremityMuscle, Skeletalankle instabilitybalancefoot corelower extremityrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35724360
PMCPMC10784881
OpenAlexW4283205518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.