Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723978›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2022

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Binds to Human Cells More Strongly than the Wild Type: Evidence from Molecular Dynamics Simulation.

Hoang Linh Nguyen, Nguyen Quoc Thai, Phuong H Nguyen, Mai Suan Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry: implications for biomedical strategies.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hoang Linh NguyenLife Science Lab, Institute for Computational Science and Technology, Quang Trung Software City, Tan Chanh Hiep Ward, District 12, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-4141-1642
Nguyen Quoc ThaiLife Science Lab, Institute for Computational Science and Technology, Quang Trung Software City, Tan Chanh Hiep Ward, District 12, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-9096-1611
Phuong H NguyenCNRS, Universit́e de Paris, UPR9080, Laboratoire de Biochimie Th́eorique, Paris, France; Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, FondationEdmond de Rothschild, PSL Research University, Paris 75006, France.
Mai Suan LiInstitute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, al. Lotnikow 32/46, Warsaw 02-668, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7021-7916
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitute for Computational Science and Technology · VNInstitute of Physics · PLVietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of the variant of concern Omicron (B.1.1.529) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has aggravated the Covid-19 pandemic due to its very contagious ability. The high infection rate may be due to the high binding affinity of Omicron to human cells, but both experimental and computational studies have yielded conflicting results on this issue. Some studies have shown that the Omicron variant binds to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) more strongly than the wild type (WT), but other studies have reported comparable binding affinities. To shed light on this open problem, in this work, we calculated the binding free energy of the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the WT and Omicron spike protein to hACE2 using all-atom molecular dynamics simulation and the molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area method. We showed that Omicron binds to human cells more strongly than the WT due to increased RBD charge, which enhances electrostatic interaction with negatively charged hACE2. N440K, T478K, E484A, Q493R, and Q498R mutations in the RBD have been found to play a critical role in the stability of the RBD-hACE2 complex. The effect of homogeneous and heterogeneous models of glycans coating the viral RBD and the peptidyl domain of hACE2 was examined. Although the total binding free energy is not sensitive to the glycan model, the distribution of per-residue interaction energies depends on it. In addition, glycans have a little effect on the binding affinity of the WT RBD to hACE2.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationPandemicsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AProtein BindingSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusPeptidyl-Dipeptidase ASpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35723978
PMCPMC9235043
OpenAlexW4283159267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.