Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723875›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Deep learning for emergency ascites diagnosis using ultrasonography images.

Zhanye Lin, Zhengyi Li, Peng Cao, Yingying Lin, Fengting Liang, Jiajun He, Libing Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Deep learning for emergency ascites diagnosis using ultrasonography images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhanye LinShantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2894-7568
Zhengyi LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Peng CaoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yingying LinDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Fengting LiangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Jiajun HeSouth China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Libing HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen SZSM201612027Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund SZXK052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe detection of abdominal free fluid or hemoperitoneum can provide critical information for clinical diagnosis and treatment, particularly in emergencies. This study investigates the use of deep learning (DL) for identifying peritoneal free fluid in ultrasonography (US) images of the abdominal cavity, which can help inexperienced physicians or non-professional people in diagnosis. It focuses specifically on first-response scenarios involving focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) technique.

methodsA total of 2985 US images were collected from ascites patients treated from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2017 at the Shenzhen Second People's Hospital. The data were categorized as Ascites-1, Ascites-2, or Ascites-3, based on the surrounding anatomy. A uniform standard for regions of interest (ROIs) and the lack of obstruction from acoustic shadow was used to classify positive samples. These images were then divided into training (90%) and test (10%) datasets to evaluate the performance of a U-net model, utilizing an encoder-decoder architecture and contracting and expansive paths, developed as part of the study.

resultsTest results produced sensitivity and specificity values of 94.38% and 68.13%, respectively, in the diagnosis of Ascites-1 US images, with an average Dice coefficient of 0.65 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.21). Similarly, the sensitivity and specificity for Ascites-2 were 97.12% and 86.33%, respectively, with an average Dice coefficient of 0.79 (SD = 0.14). The accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) were 81.25% and 0.76 for Ascites-1 and 91.73% and 0.91 for Ascites-2.

conclusionThe results produced by the U-net demonstrate the viability of DL for automated ascites diagnosis. This suggests the proposed technique could be highly valuable for improving FAST-based preliminary diagnoses, particularly in emergency scenarios.

Indexed as

AscitesDeep LearningAbdomenHumansSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyabdominal free fluiddeep learningemergencyultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35723875
PMCPMC9278686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.