Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723814›Full record

Trial reportChinese journal of integrative medicine2022

Ruyi Zhenbao Pills for Patients with Motor and Sensory Dysfunction after Stroke: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Shan-Shan Ling, Rui-Huan Pan, Le-Chang Zhan, Mei Li, Zhi-Jing Yang, Hao-Dong Yang, Hong-Xia Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04029701 (Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Motor and Sensory Dysfunction After Stroke With Ruyizhenbao Pill), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04029701 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Observation on the Treatment of Motor and Sensory Dysfunction After Stroke With Ruyizhenbao Pill

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuangzhou University of Traditional Chinese MedicineRan2017 to 2019Enrolled120ConditionsPost-stroke Patients With Motor and Sensory DysfunctionArmsRuyizhenbao Pill, Placebo of Ruyizhenbao Pill
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shan-Shan LingDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Rui-Huan PanDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Le-Chang ZhanDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Mei LiDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Zhi-Jing YangDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Hao-Dong YangThe Second Institute of Clinical Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Hong-Xia ChenDepartment of Rehabilitation, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China. chx2004@126.com.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tibetan medicine Ruyi Zhenbao Pills (RZPs) in the treatment of patients with motor and sensory dysfunction after stroke.

methodsA total of 120 convalescent stroke patients hospitalized in the Rehabilitation Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine from June 2017 to December 2019 were enrolled in this trial. Patients were assigned to control (60 cases) and research (60 cases) groups by computer random assignment. All patients received internal treatment and modern rehabilitation training. On this basis, the research group was given oral RZPs for 4 weeks, while the control group was given oral placebo. The primary outcome was motor function of the affected side evaluated by simplified Fugl-Meyer Motion Assessment Scale (FMA-M). The secondary outcomes included sensory function, activity of daily living (ADL), quality of life, balance function, and pain, which were assessed by Fugl-Meyer Sensory Assessment Scale (FMA-S), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Special Scale of the Quality of Life (SS-QOL), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), respectively. All of the assessments were performed before treatment, and 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. Vital signs, liver and kidney functions, routine blood test, blood coagulation profile, and routine urinalysis of patients were monitored.

resultsAfter 4-week treatment, the FMA-M, BBS and FMA-S scores in the research group significantly increased compared with the control group (P<0.05). At 8-week follow-up, the BBS and MBI scores in the research group were higher than the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in the SS-QOL and VAS scores at 4 and 8 weeks (P>0.05). Moreover, after treatment, there was no significant difference in vital signs, liver and kidney functions, blood coagulation function, blood routine and urinalysis between the 2 groups (P>0.05).

conclusionRZPs improved limb motor, balance, and sensory functions of stroke patients during recovery period with good safety. (Trial registration No. NCT04029701).

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingHumansQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomemotor dysfunctionpost-strokerandomized controlled trialRuyi Zhenbao Pillssensory dysfunctionTibetan medicine

Identifiers

PMID35723814
OpenAlexW4283211834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.