Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723783›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2022

Polypharmacy in Older Heart Failure Patients: a Multidisciplinary Approach.

Smrithi Sukumar, Ariela R Orkaby, Janice B Schwartz, Zachary Marcum, James L Januzzi, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Haider J Warraich

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Smrithi SukumarDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ariela R OrkabyDepartment of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Janice B SchwartzDepartment of Medicine, UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Zachary MarcumUW School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
James L JanuzziDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Muthiah VaduganathanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Haider J WarraichDepartment of Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9493-1372
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Frailty, Statins, and Cardiovascular Disease Burden in Older AdultsR03AG060169 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ORKABY, ARIELA R · 2018 to 2019
$193k
Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and FrailtyIK2CX001800 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI ORKABY, ARIELA R · 2019 to 2023
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001800NIA NIH HHS R03 AG060169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe provide a review of considerations when applying principles of optimal pharmacotherapy to older adults with heart failure (HF), an analysis on the pivotal clinical trials focusing on applicability to older adults, and multi-disciplinary strategies to optimize the health of HF patients with polypharmacy. RECENT

findingsPolypharmacy is very common among patients with HF, due to medications for both HF and non-HF comorbidities. Definitions of polypharmacy were not developed specifically for older adults with HF and may need to be modified in order to meaningfully describe medication burden and promote appropriate medical therapy. This is because clinical practice guidelines for multi-drug HF regimens have unique considerations, given that they improve outcomes and symptoms of HF. Adults older than 65 years are well represented in contemporary clinical trials for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). While these trials did not have significant heterogeneity in safety or efficacy across a broad age spectrum, some may have limited representation of adults ≥ 80 years old, the sickest older adults, or those with decreased functional status. There is also a lack of data on the safety and efficacy of deprescribing HF medications, and deprescription in otherwise stable patients may lead to clinical destabilization or disease progression. There is therefore innate tension between the well-studied benefits of optimized HF therapy for older adults that must be weighed against the risks of polypharmacy and many unknowns that still exist. Given the strong evidence that optimized HF therapies confer symptomatic and mortality benefits for older adults, it is clear that polypharmacy in this context can be appropriate. A shift in paradigm is therefore needed when evaluating polypharmacy in patients with HF. Instead of assuming all polypharmacy is "good" or "bad," we propose a concerted move, using a multidisciplinary approach, to focus on the "appropriateness" of specific medications, in order to optimize HF medical therapy. Clinicians of all specialties caring for complex older adults with HF must consider goals of care, functional status, and new evidence-based therapies, in order to optimize this polypharmacy for older adults.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, LeftAgedAged, 80 and overHumansPolypharmacyStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftGuideline-directed medical therapyHeart failureMulti-disciplinaryOlder adultsPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID35723783
OpenAlexW4283156117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.