Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723771›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2022

Telemedicine-based new patient consultations for hernia repair and advanced abdominal wall reconstruction.

J O Bray, T L Sutton, M S Akhter, E Iqbal, S B Orenstein, V C Nikolian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Body mass index and the risk of abdominal hernia: a Mendelian randomization study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J O BrayGastrointestinal & General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: L 233A, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
T L SuttonGastrointestinal & General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: L 233A, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
M S AkhterGastrointestinal & General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: L 233A, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
E IqbalColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
S B OrensteinGastrointestinal & General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: L 233A, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
V C NikolianGastrointestinal & General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code: L 233A, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. nikolian@ohsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7729-732X
Oregon Health & Science University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTelemedicine has emerged as a viable option to in-person visits for the evaluation and management of surgical patients. Increased integration of telemedicine has allowed for greater access to care for specific patient populations but relative outcomes are unstudied. Given these limitations, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of telemedicine-based new patient preoperative encounters in comparison to in-person encounters.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing new patient evaluations from April 2020 to October 2021. Telemedicine visits consist of both video and telephone-based encounters. Visit types, patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis, travel time to the hospital, and prior imaging availability were reviewed.

resultsA total of 276 new patient encounters were conducted (n = 108, 39% telemedicine). Indications for evaluation included inguinal hernia (n = 81, 30%), ventral hernia (n = 149, 54%) and groin or abdominal pain (n = 30, 11%). Patients undergoing telehealth evaluations were more likely to have greater travel distance to the hospital (91 km vs 29 km, p = 0.002) and have CT image-confirmed diagnoses at the initial visit (73 vs 47%, p < 0.001). Patients who were evaluated for a recurrent or incisional hernia were more likely to be seen through a telemedicine encounter (69 vs 45%, p < 0.001).

conclusionsWe report the efficacy of telemedicine-based consultations for new patient preoperative evaluations related to hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction. Telemedicine is a useful modality for preoperative evaluation of new patients with hernia and advanced abdominal wall reconstruction needs. Understanding this patient population will allow us to optimize telemedicine encounters for new patients and improve access to care for patients in remote locations.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallHernia, VentralTelemedicineAdultHerniorrhaphyHumansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesAbdominal wall reconstructionDownstream care utilizationTelemedicineVirtual care

Identifiers

PMID35723771
PMCPMC9207428
OpenAlexW4283167171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.