Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35723716›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Differentiation of benign from malignant solid renal lesions with MRI-based radiomics and machine learning.

Ruben Ngnitewe Massa'a, Elizabeth M Stoeckl, Meghan G Lubner, David Smith, Lu Mao, Daniel D Shapiro, E Jason Abel, Andrew L Wentland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. CT-based conventional radiomics and quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting benign and malignant renal lesions.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Use of Radiomic Tools in Renal Mass Characterization.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruben Ngnitewe Massa'aDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Elizabeth M StoecklDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Meghan G LubnerDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
David SmithDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Lu MaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Daniel D ShapiroDepartment of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
E Jason AbelDepartment of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Andrew L WentlandDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. alwentland@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolid renal masses are often indeterminate for benignity versus malignancy on magnetic resonance imaging. Such masses are typically evaluated with either percutaneous biopsy or surgical resection. Percutaneous biopsy can be non-diagnostic and some surgically resected lesions are inadvertently benign. PURPOSE: To assess the performance of ten machine learning (ML) algorithms trained with MRI-based radiomics features in distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses.

methodsPatients with solid renal masses identified on pre-intervention MRI were curated from our institutional database. Masses with a definitive diagnosis via imaging (for angiomyolipomas) or via biopsy or surgical resection (for oncocytomas or renal cell carcinomas) were selected. Each mass was segmented for both T2- and post-contrast T1-weighted images. Radiomics features were derived from the segmented masses for each imaging sequence. Ten ML algorithms were trained with the radiomics features gleaned from each MR sequence, as well as the combination of MR sequences.

resultsIn total, 182 renal masses in 160 patients were included in the study. The support vector machine algorithm trained on radiomics features from T2-weighted images performed superiorly, with an accuracy of 0.80 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. Linear discriminant analysis (accuracy = 0.84 and AUC = 0.77) and logistic regression (accuracy = 0.78 and AUC = 0.78) algorithms trained on T2-based radiomics features performed similarly. ML algorithms trained on radiomics features from post-contrast T1-weighted images or the combination of radiomics features from T2- and post-contrast T1-weighted images yielded lower performance.

conclusionMachine learning models trained with radiomics features derived from T2-weighted images can provide high accuracy for distinguishing benign from malignant solid renal masses. CLINICAL IMPACT: Machine learning models derived from MRI-based radiomics features may improve the clinical management of solid renal masses and have the potential to reduce the frequency with which benign solid renal masses are biopsied or surgically resected.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomicsRenal cell carcinomaSolid renal masses

Identifiers

PMID35723716
OpenAlexW4283207918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.