ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2022
Cranial base measurements in different anteroposterior skeletal relationships using Bjork-Jarabak analysis.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Long-term stability of maxillary molar distalization in the treatment of Angle Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Pooled it
- Contributions of anterior and posterior components of cranial flexure on skeletal classification: a cone-beam computed tomography study.The Angle orthodontist · 2026Article
- Impact of cranial collimation on cephalometric landmark visibility.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Effects of the SOCIA III Appliance in Patients with Pseudo-Class III Malocclusion.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Anterior alveolar bone and tooth inclination in different skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Digital-assisted diagnosis and orthodontic management of an impacted mandibular lateral incisor: a case report.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Craniofacial features and incisor position design of esthetics population after orthodontic treatment.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024Article
- Comparison of linear distance of glenoid fossa to frontomaxillary nasal suture in skeletal Class-II and skeletal Class-I malocclusion.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Comparison of the transverse cranial base dimension in different craniofacial skeletal relationships: A cone-beam computed tomography study.Journal of dental sciences · 2024Article
- Comparison of the posterior teeth angulations in orthodontic patients with different facial growth patterns.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2023Article
- Craniofacial and upper airway morphological characteristics associated with the presence and severity of obstructive sleep apnea in Chinese children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the linear and angular cranial base measurements (Bjork polygon) in different anteroposterior (AP) skeletal relationships using Bjork-Jarabak analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsPretreatment lateral cephalograms of 288 (146 women, 142 men, mean ages 21.24 ± 2.72 years and 22.94 ± 3.28 years, respectively) adult patients were divided into Class I, II, and III skeletal relationships according to their ANB angle. Linear and angular measurements of Bjork polygon were measured and compared among different skeletal relationships. Analysis of variance was performed to detect the differences among groups. Independent-sample t-test was used to detect differences between men and women.
resultsThe Class II skeletal relationship has a significantly larger saddle angle than Class III does (P < .05), whereas Class III has a significantly larger gonial angle than Class II does (P < .05). The articular angle and sum of Bjork polygon angles were not significantly different among groups (P > .05). Anterior (N-S) and posterior (S-Ar) cranial base lengths were similar in the different AP skeletal relationships (P > .05). The ramal height and body of the mandible length were significantly larger in Class III compared with Class I and II (P < .05). Women had a significantly larger articular angle than men did (P < .05), although men had significantly larger linear measurements of Bjork polygon than women did (P < .05).
conclusionsThe Class III skeletal relationship has a smaller saddle angle and larger mandibular length and gonial angle. Men have a larger cranial base and mandibular linear measurements and a smaller articular angle compared with women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.